2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-006-0098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention properties of wood residues and their potential for soil amelioration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If BC retains more nutrients, their loss through leaching could be reduced. This process for increasing nutrient availability has been shown in laboratory (Dünisch et al, 2007; Novak et al, 2009a; Laird et al, 2010b; Singh et al, 2010) and greenhouse studies with plants (Lehmann et al, 2003; Knowles et al, 2011). Lehmann et al (2003) found that “fresh” BC addition to a tropical Oxisol led to a 60% reduction in leaching of applied ammonium (NH 4 + ) compared with the unamended control over 40 d of cropping rice ( Oryza sativa L.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…If BC retains more nutrients, their loss through leaching could be reduced. This process for increasing nutrient availability has been shown in laboratory (Dünisch et al, 2007; Novak et al, 2009a; Laird et al, 2010b; Singh et al, 2010) and greenhouse studies with plants (Lehmann et al, 2003; Knowles et al, 2011). Lehmann et al (2003) found that “fresh” BC addition to a tropical Oxisol led to a 60% reduction in leaching of applied ammonium (NH 4 + ) compared with the unamended control over 40 d of cropping rice ( Oryza sativa L.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Biochar amendment has been proposed as an interesting strategy to retain nitrates in irrigated soils, in order to promote plant consumption of accumulated mineral N, and reduce nitrate leaching [45][46][47]. This beneficial effect of biochar was clearly shown in the second year of the field experiments, as biochar-amended plots that received a reduced amount of irrigation and mineral fertilization showed a higher concentration of nitrates in the soil solution of the root zone in comparison to the plot receiving only manure under the same irrigation and fertilization scheme (Table 3).…”
Section: Soil Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other studies, maize BCH and urea fertilizer lead to the short-term reductions in soil mineral N availability as a result of probable BCH negative effect on soil quality and fertility characteristics [54]. It might be also caused by the significant absorption of N up to 22.1% with the ash/charcoal woody residues according to the studies of Dünisch et al [56], where actually the same has been observed in the case of available P compounds (up to 11.7%). Biomass and soil P content remained without any significant differences between the G2 treatments ( Figure 6, 7).…”
Section: The Effect Of the Bch Mixed With The Bacterial Inoculums Andmentioning
confidence: 95%