1972
DOI: 10.2307/1421720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention-Task Carryover Effects after Verbal-Discrimination Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is assumed that the first-list context-item associations initially compete with the acquisition of the corresponding transfer list context-item associations and extinguish during the course of transfer list learning in a fashion comparable to the specific associations of the A-B, A-C paired-associate transfer paradigm. The retention data, indicating less retention of first-list items following W 2 -R 2 learning than the appropriate control groups, (Kanak & Curtis, 1970) are in complete accord with this explanation as are more recent data from three experiments reported by Kanak, Cole, and Curtis (1972).…”
Section: Classical Paradigmssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Moreover, it is assumed that the first-list context-item associations initially compete with the acquisition of the corresponding transfer list context-item associations and extinguish during the course of transfer list learning in a fashion comparable to the specific associations of the A-B, A-C paired-associate transfer paradigm. The retention data, indicating less retention of first-list items following W 2 -R 2 learning than the appropriate control groups, (Kanak & Curtis, 1970) are in complete accord with this explanation as are more recent data from three experiments reported by Kanak, Cole, and Curtis (1972).…”
Section: Classical Paradigmssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It has been well demonstrated that verbal discrimination transfer tasks, like pairedassociate tasks (McGovern, 1964), allow the development of associations between the environmental context of the task and the intrapair W and R items (Kanak, Cole, & Curtis, 1972;Kanak & Curtis, 1970). The common learning context for List 1 and List 2 will be called C. Associations are incidentally formed between C and Wi and C and Rt during List 1 learning.…”
Section: N Jack Kanak University Of Oklahomamentioning
confidence: 99%