2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10772-017-9436-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking classification results based on read speech, or: why improvements do not always transfer to other speaking styles

Abstract: results suggest that we cannot continue to develop methods for one speech style and expect that improvements transfer to other styles. Instead, the nature of the application data (here: read vs. conversational) should be taken into account already when defining the basic assumptions of a method (here: segmentation in phones), and not only when applying the method to the application data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open-ended Question Task, on the other hand, provides more naturalistic data, which can complement the information available in read speech. The notion that they may provide different types of information is confirmed by works such as Schuppler (2017) which discussed the need for developing methods for different speaking styles instead of just focusing on read speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Open-ended Question Task, on the other hand, provides more naturalistic data, which can complement the information available in read speech. The notion that they may provide different types of information is confirmed by works such as Schuppler (2017) which discussed the need for developing methods for different speaking styles instead of just focusing on read speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Open-ended Question Task, on the other hand, provides more naturalistic data, which can complement the information available in read speech. The notion that they may provide different types of information is confirmed by works such as Schuppler (2017) which discussed the need for developing methods for different speaking styles instead of just focusing on read speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%