Rethinking communication: integrating storytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis

Abstract

Storytelling is a two-way interaction, written or oral, between someone telling a story and one or more listeners. It is a well-known and powerful means of communicating messages and engaging audiences. In this commentary paper, we present a framework for the integration of storytelling in systematic reviews and systematic maps at the stages where stakeholders are actively involved. Using storytelling to explain complex research has, in the past, not been considered a rigorous method of communicating science. But an increasing number of studies are showing how narratives can be useful for developing trust with an audience and increasing knowledge retention as well as the ability and willingness by audiences to learn and take action. Being easily digested by the human brain, stories help bridging between our logos and pathos; when an audience becomes emotionally receptive of facts, chances increase that they will respond and act on the knowledge. Here, we argue that storytelling holds potential as a tool in systematic reviews and systematic maps, serving mainly two purposes. First, collecting contextual narratives from stakeholders at the stages of question formulation and protocol writing can help to inform and generate relevant research questions and review designs. Here, we refer to contextual narratives as stories gathered from stakeholders to gain an understanding of their perspective. Second, creating a final story that faithfully presents the review results, while also relating to the contextual narratives, can contribute to effective communication of the results to stakeholders as well as to a broader audience. This approach can increase their engagement with the science and the implementation of evidence-based decisions. The paper concludes that storytelling holds untapped potential for communicating evidence from systematic reviews and maps for increased stakeholder engagement. It is time for researchers and research networks such as the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence to support and emphasize the importance of exploring new tools for effective science communication, such as storytelling.

Do Personal Stories Make Patient Decision Aids More Effective? An Update from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards

“…Narratives may also be helpful in communicating evidence from systematic reviews and improve stakeholder engagement. 58 What is unclear is if narrative-based communications are likely to be more effective than research-informed PtDAs communicating these more complex issues.…”

“…They may be a particularly effective tool when health communicators are trying to help patients avoid surprise and regret, recognize dominant options (e.g., smoking cessation), motivate to act or not act, and make multi-attribute tradeoff decisions. Narratives may also be helpful in communicating evidence from systematic reviews and improve stakeholder engagement (58). What is unclear is if narrative-based communications are likely to be more effective than research-informed PtDAs communicating these more complex issues.…”

Earning trust and building credibility with a new paradigm for effective scientific risk-benefit communication of biotechnology innovations

“…This concept has been described as storytelling. Come to think of it, we all are captivated by stories (Sundin et al, 2018). There is nothing in endearing listeners and that works like telling stories that are not just as true but also captivating.…”

Change in Format, Register and Narration Style in the Biomedical Literature: A 1948 Example

“…This study may be a powerful reminder of how science can be explained in an engaging way. Readability may be a very important factor, even for science reporting, if we consider that getting the message through should be a requirement for every scientific article, at least any scientific report that is striving to leave a mark in science, even in the limited scientific niche where it is positioned [91].…”