2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking current models in social psychology: A Bayesian framework to understand dramatic social change

Abstract: Dramatic social change (DSC) is the new normal, affecting millions of people around the world. However, not all events plunge societies into DSC. According to de la Sablonnière (2017, Front. Psychol., 8, 1), events that have a rapid pace of change, that rupture an entire group's social and normative structures, and that threaten the group's cultural identity will result in DSC. This perspective provokes important unanswered questions: What is the chance that a DSC will occur if an event takes place? And, when … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The COVID‐19 pandemic has increased the urgency of going beyond the individual to understand health behaviors. Societal crises such as pandemics weaken the fundamental structures of society (de la Sablonnière, Lina, & Cárdenas, 2019) and therefore demand a strong sense of group or collective commitment in order to overcome the crisis; put simply, “united we stand or divided we fall.” Moreover, successfully managing the pandemic requires that a great majority of the population rapidly adopts government‐endorsed (or mandated) health behaviors and, importantly, sustains these behaviors until a vaccine has been succesfully rolled out, effective therapeutics have become available, or the pandemic has subsided. This widespread collective behavior change may most readily be achieved in the presence of sociopolitical factors that emphasize being part of an organized, shared, group effort, a sense of social cohesiveness, as opposed to an individual qua individual effort.…”
Section: Current Models Of Health Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID‐19 pandemic has increased the urgency of going beyond the individual to understand health behaviors. Societal crises such as pandemics weaken the fundamental structures of society (de la Sablonnière, Lina, & Cárdenas, 2019) and therefore demand a strong sense of group or collective commitment in order to overcome the crisis; put simply, “united we stand or divided we fall.” Moreover, successfully managing the pandemic requires that a great majority of the population rapidly adopts government‐endorsed (or mandated) health behaviors and, importantly, sustains these behaviors until a vaccine has been succesfully rolled out, effective therapeutics have become available, or the pandemic has subsided. This widespread collective behavior change may most readily be achieved in the presence of sociopolitical factors that emphasize being part of an organized, shared, group effort, a sense of social cohesiveness, as opposed to an individual qua individual effort.…”
Section: Current Models Of Health Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, de la Sablonnière and colleagues () take on an important conceptual challenge: that of defining dramatic social change and the conditions that underlie it. de la Sablonnière et al .…”
Section: The Special Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between social change and the experience of existential threat to cultural identity is also emphasized in de la Sablonnière and colleagues' typology of social change (de la Sablonnière, 2017;de la Sablonnière et al, 2019;de la Sablonnière & Taylor, 2020). On the one hand, a perceived threat to cultural identity is a key condition for what de la Sablonnière (2017) terms dramatic social change, defined as "a situation where a rapid event leads to a profound societal transformation and produces a rupture in the equilibrium of the social and normative structures and changes/threatens the cultural identity of group" (p.12).…”
Section: Minority Intergroup Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%