Rethinking Data through Pueblo Interpretations

Luarkie, Richard

doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-014-1_7

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indigenous Peoples have been conducting research-systematically advancing human knowledge and understanding-for millennia (Luarkie, 2017;Tuhiwai Smith, 1999). Indigenous intellectual traditions are diverse, profound, and foundationally different from mainstream research paradigms (Warrior, 1999).…”

Section: Indigenous Research and Intellectual Traditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indigenous intellectual traditions are diverse, profound, and foundationally different from mainstream research paradigms (Warrior, 1999). Indigenous research recognizes relational responsibility between the researcher and creation, can be empirical, draws on traditional teachings, and may include explicit spiritual or revelatory elements (Brant Castellano, 2000;Luarkie, 2017;Wilson, 2001). Warrior (1999) provocatively suggests that Indigenous thought is fundamentally based on topos (place or territory), whereas Western research paradigms are predicated on logos (reason).…”

Section: Indigenous Research and Intellectual Traditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Advancing Indigenous Research Sovereignty: Public Administration Trends and the Opportunity for Meaningful Conversations in Canadian Research Governance

Williams

Umangay²,

Brant³

2020

iipj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Federally funded research in Canada is of significant scope and scale. The implications of research in the colonial project has resulted in a fraught relationship between Indigenous Peoples and Western research. Research governance, as an aspect of public administration, is evolving. The relationality inherent in new public governance (NPG)—a nascent public governance regime—may align with Indigenous relationality concepts. Recent societal advances, such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Truth and Reconcilliation Commission of Canada (TRC), and the Indigenous Institutes Act in Ontario, provide further impetus for Indigenous self-determination in multiple domains including research. This article advocates for Indigenous research sovereignty and concludes with suggestions for ways in which federal funding agencies, specifically the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), could contribute to the advancement of Indigenous research sovereignty.

show abstract

Section: Indigenous Research and Intellectual Traditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%