2015
DOI: 10.5334/sta.go
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Programs

Abstract: This article introduces the special issue on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and 'Armed Non-Statutory Actors' (ANSAs), whose title we prefer to the less precise label of Armed Non-State Actors. The understanding that DDR programs are essential in helping to prevent the recurrence of war in post-conflict situations is at the heart of current peacebuilding practice and the academic literature on peacekeeping and stabilization. However, the changing strategic context of DDR programs and in par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These programs have been termed as being part of the “First Generation DDR,” which are programs that were implemented under the framework of peace agreements between belligerent factions (International Organisation for Migration, 2019). However, as noted by Munive and Stepputat (2015, pp. 1–2) there was the need to reconfigure DDR to “(1) deal with armed groups while conflict is still ongoing and without a negotiated peace accord being in place and (2) deal with situations of armed conflict that involve hybrid forms of violence as well as a range of armed actors that control, or influence significantly, population and territories, without being part of peace negotiations or under direct state control.” These realities led to the emergence of what is described as Second-Generation DDR as emphasized by Anatole Ayissi (2021, pp.…”
Section: Ddr Programs and Related Initiatives In Africamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These programs have been termed as being part of the “First Generation DDR,” which are programs that were implemented under the framework of peace agreements between belligerent factions (International Organisation for Migration, 2019). However, as noted by Munive and Stepputat (2015, pp. 1–2) there was the need to reconfigure DDR to “(1) deal with armed groups while conflict is still ongoing and without a negotiated peace accord being in place and (2) deal with situations of armed conflict that involve hybrid forms of violence as well as a range of armed actors that control, or influence significantly, population and territories, without being part of peace negotiations or under direct state control.” These realities led to the emergence of what is described as Second-Generation DDR as emphasized by Anatole Ayissi (2021, pp.…”
Section: Ddr Programs and Related Initiatives In Africamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The social reintegration of former combatants is one aspect of the disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration process (Munive & Stepputat, 2015;Özerdem, 2002;Steenken, 2017). Özerdem (2012) argues that an inclusive approach to social reintegration is the most effective model for ex-combatant reintegration by focusing on three dimensions, namely "family and community," "sustainable employment," and "civic responsibilities" (Özerdem, 2012, p. 53).…”
Section: Social Reintegration In a Deradicalisation Program By Diseng...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reintegration proved to be a challenging process for DDR programs (Giustozzi, 2012;McMullin, 2013a;Bowd & Ozerden, 2013). Research shows little evidence of DDR programs meeting their intended outcomes (Agbedahin, 2018;Dudwick & Srinivasan, 2013;Munive & Stepputat, 2015;Schulhofer-Wohl & Sambanis, 2010). Efforts to assess the immediate outcomes of DDR programs have shown mixed results.…”
Section: Reintegration Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%