2007
DOI: 10.1386/sac.1.3.315_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking distribution: developing the parameters for a micro-analysis of the movement of motion pictures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each screening venue is interconnected within a market economy, both by the physical transport routes along which the film cans travel, as well as by commercial linkages ranging from national theatre chains to local venue coownership. In this way, the study of something as prosaic as train timetables becomes significant in understanding how and why films appear at particular locations (see Thorne 2007). And while the market exerts an influence on cinema programming, this influence is not one that we can simply characterise as "movies on demand".…”
Section: Mapping the Moviesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each screening venue is interconnected within a market economy, both by the physical transport routes along which the film cans travel, as well as by commercial linkages ranging from national theatre chains to local venue coownership. In this way, the study of something as prosaic as train timetables becomes significant in understanding how and why films appear at particular locations (see Thorne 2007). And while the market exerts an influence on cinema programming, this influence is not one that we can simply characterise as "movies on demand".…”
Section: Mapping the Moviesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this is not necessarily the case. With the exception of several government-initiated or sponsored reports -from the 1927 Royal Commission to the likes of Jones (1998) and Reid (1999) -the specific analysis of distribution in Australia has been scarce, though notable exceptions include the work of Lobato (2007Lobato ( , 2010, Walsh (1997), Bertrand and Routt (1989), Molloy and Burgan (1993), Luckman and de Roeper (2008) and Thorne (2007). This deficit is particularly telling at a time when film distribution and exhibition methodologies are fundamentally being challenged by new technologies and shifting audience preferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%