2015
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking our assumptions about the evolution of bird song and other sexually dimorphic signals

Abstract: Bird song is often cited as a classic example of a sexually-selected ornament, in part because historically it has been considered a primarily male trait. Recent evidence that females also sing in many songbird species and that sexual dimorphism in song is often the result of losses in females rather than gains in males therefore appears to challenge our understanding of the evolution of bird song through sexual selection. Here I propose that these new findings do not necessarily contradict previous research, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is often not explicitly tested and there is debate in the literature about how such testing should be done (Wilkins et al 2013, Byers 2015, Price 2015. None of the studies included here measured proxies of sexual selection, such as time to pairing, reproductive success, or level of parasite or disease infection, leaving room for improvement in future studies.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is often not explicitly tested and there is debate in the literature about how such testing should be done (Wilkins et al 2013, Byers 2015, Price 2015. None of the studies included here measured proxies of sexual selection, such as time to pairing, reproductive success, or level of parasite or disease infection, leaving room for improvement in future studies.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correlation, so they show, accounts for almost half of the observed variation in telencephalic size, more than any other behavioral specialization examined, including the ability to learn song. Moreover, female song is widespread and ancestral in birds [38][39][40][41]. In other words, as was recognized some time ago, relying on the zebra finch model in terms of broader questions of behavior could lead to ignoring the importance of social learning in non-reproductive contexts [42,43], the significance of variability in avian communication outside the breeding context and the possibility of different underlying mechanisms of brain activity [44][45][46] for hearing and vocal production, of which lateralization may be an important manifestation.…”
Section: Limitations: Species Investigatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence that female song is "common" rather than "exceptional" (Riebel et al, 2005;Garamszegi et al, 2007;Price, 2009;Odom et al, 2014), which focuses research attention on the role of sexual selection for complex female song (Price, 2015). Song complexity in females varies greatly across species (Odom et al, 2014;Price, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence that female song is "common" rather than "exceptional" (Riebel et al, 2005;Garamszegi et al, 2007;Price, 2009;Odom et al, 2014), which focuses research attention on the role of sexual selection for complex female song (Price, 2015). Song complexity in females varies greatly across species (Odom et al, 2014;Price, 2015). As discussed by Price (2015): "Although female song is often treated as a discrete binary character in comparisons among species, with some species categorized as having female song and others not (e.g., Garamszegi et al, 2007;Price, 2009;Odom et al, 2014), evidence suggests that female singing can vary continuously across taxa in both expression and complexity."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation