A Feminist Urban Theory for Our Time 2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119789161.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Social Reproduction and the Urban

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that to understand how Lucia transforms her city, one might want to look not only into what she does in designated spaces of social and political actuation, such as the favelas as a whole, or EDUCAP, but also in other ‘spaces’ and ‘moments’ of her everyday life, which are all interconnected to the point where they sometimes become more or less indistinct. Lucia's case perfectly illustrates what many feminist, post‐ and decolonial urban scholars have been arguing for a long time: that a universalistic understanding of urbanization offers an interesting tool for comparison between urban and regional contexts, yet does not account for the way socially and culturally specific processes produce ‘other’ forms of urbanization (Parnell and Robinson, 2012; Peake, 2016; Beebeejaun, 2017; Maclean, 2018; Tanyildiz et al ., 2021; Truelove and Ruszczyk, 2022). Even changing the scale from global patterns of urbanization (Brenner and Schmid, 2015) to that of the slum, the periphery or the margins does not automatically translate into an understanding of how social and cultural differences shape our urban future.…”
Section: Lucia's Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that to understand how Lucia transforms her city, one might want to look not only into what she does in designated spaces of social and political actuation, such as the favelas as a whole, or EDUCAP, but also in other ‘spaces’ and ‘moments’ of her everyday life, which are all interconnected to the point where they sometimes become more or less indistinct. Lucia's case perfectly illustrates what many feminist, post‐ and decolonial urban scholars have been arguing for a long time: that a universalistic understanding of urbanization offers an interesting tool for comparison between urban and regional contexts, yet does not account for the way socially and culturally specific processes produce ‘other’ forms of urbanization (Parnell and Robinson, 2012; Peake, 2016; Beebeejaun, 2017; Maclean, 2018; Tanyildiz et al ., 2021; Truelove and Ruszczyk, 2022). Even changing the scale from global patterns of urbanization (Brenner and Schmid, 2015) to that of the slum, the periphery or the margins does not automatically translate into an understanding of how social and cultural differences shape our urban future.…”
Section: Lucia's Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though her research is specific to Guatemala, it resonates with the way social life is organised in many of the municipalities of Oaxaca, including Kajp, as well as in Indigenous communities throughout Mesoamerica and the Andes, many of which are embroiled in struggles against state violence and expanding extractivism (see Erpel Jara, 2018;Navarro Trujillo, 2019;Tzul Tzul, 2015). Importantly, I connect Tzul Tzul's theories with those of feminist geographers who are expanding ideas about social reproduction as life-making within and outside of capitalist modes of production (Andrucki et al, 2017;Meehan & Strauss, 2015;Mitchell et al, 2003;Tanyildiz et al, 2021). For example, analyses of the diverse economic activities of Black and Indigenous people in the Americas argue that they are sites of struggle and celebration that do not neatly fit into the categories of 'economically productive or socially reproductive' and refuse capitalist expectations (Hossein & Christabell, 2022;Mullings, 2021, p. 156).…”
Section: Theories Of (Social) Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting precarious conditions of everyday life for marginalized women in Southern urban contexts, which include structural inequalities related to access to infrastructure, labour, and wages, gender-based violence, and underrepresentation in governance, are well documented in gender and urbanization research (Chant & McIlwaine, 2016;Razavi, 2020;Tacoli & Satterthwaite, 2013). Moreover, these conditions trouble the notion of understanding everyday urbanism in terms of beforeand-after the pandemic, prompting scholars to question what is "unprecedented" about the crisis (Bahn et al, 2020;Tanyildiz et al, 2021). As a transnational network of feminists in the GenUrb project (formally titled, Urbanization and Gender in the Global South: A Transformative Knowledge Network), we conduct research and public education on the gendered dimensions of urbanization in cities in the global South, focusing on the everyday lives of women living in low-income neighbourhoods.…”
Section: Introduction: Crisis Of Social Reproduction In the Pandemic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%