1969
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1969.11773352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Student Government for Larger Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But it is unknown how many of these individuals pursue careers in higher education or student affairs (HE/SA). While we know a lot about the histories of student government as a functionality of a college campus (Alexander, 1969;Bloland, 1961;Dungan & Klopf, 1949;Frederick, 1965;Klopf, 1960), and the experiences of new professionals and graduate students in HE/SA (Hall, 2014;Renn & Hodges, 2007;Tull, Hirt, & Saunders, 2009), this study illuminates the intersection of those serving specifically as SBP who are now working in HE/SA. Using a phenomenological research approach, I ask the question: What is the lived experience of former Student Body Presidents working in higher education or student affairs?…”
Section: Presidents As Practitioners: the Lived Experience(s) Of Former Student Body Presidents Working In Higher Education Student Affaimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…But it is unknown how many of these individuals pursue careers in higher education or student affairs (HE/SA). While we know a lot about the histories of student government as a functionality of a college campus (Alexander, 1969;Bloland, 1961;Dungan & Klopf, 1949;Frederick, 1965;Klopf, 1960), and the experiences of new professionals and graduate students in HE/SA (Hall, 2014;Renn & Hodges, 2007;Tull, Hirt, & Saunders, 2009), this study illuminates the intersection of those serving specifically as SBP who are now working in HE/SA. Using a phenomenological research approach, I ask the question: What is the lived experience of former Student Body Presidents working in higher education or student affairs?…”
Section: Presidents As Practitioners: the Lived Experience(s) Of Former Student Body Presidents Working In Higher Education Student Affaimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This means, success is often measured by students’ abilities to raise funds or garner financial support through personal networks. In addition to the expectation of funding campaigns, students, administrators, staff, and faculty expect SGA officers to possess a skill set in navigating the bureaucracy often associated with academia (Alexander, 1969; Gruzka et al., 2019), which highlights social capital.…”
Section: Historical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship in turn enhances students' psychosocial and professional development.Student governance organizations may take many forms. Some institutions utilize a traditional student government structure, modeled after a state or national structure, while others design governing bodies to suit their unique needs (Alexander, 1969). The main technique institutions have used to increase student participation has been leadership training and representativeness training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%