2014
DOI: 10.1080/08934215.2014.980436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Susceptibility: Examining the Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Other-Directed Persuasive Fear Appeal Messages

Abstract: This article examines the message processing of men in response to an other-directed persuasive fear appeal regarding sexual assault against women. A sample of men read a persuasive message and completed attitude, intention, and mood assessments, and a paired message recall and thought=feeling listing task. One week later they again completed attitude and intention assessments. Results indicated that men experienced fear for the women they care about, primarily recalled threatening message information, and wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the EPPM (Witte, 1992) and the ELM (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) highlight the important role that both emotion (e.g., fear) and cognition (e.g., perceptions of response efficacy, perception of personal vulnerability to threat) play in an individual's response to message content. Whilst it is acknowledged that some recent studies (e.g., Brown & Gold, 2014;Morrison & McCormack, 2015) have used thought-listing tasks to measure spontaneously generated throughts in response to persuasive messages, formal manipulation checks of message content is not yet standard practice.…”
Section: Developed (See Chapter 8) It Aligns Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the EPPM (Witte, 1992) and the ELM (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) highlight the important role that both emotion (e.g., fear) and cognition (e.g., perceptions of response efficacy, perception of personal vulnerability to threat) play in an individual's response to message content. Whilst it is acknowledged that some recent studies (e.g., Brown & Gold, 2014;Morrison & McCormack, 2015) have used thought-listing tasks to measure spontaneously generated throughts in response to persuasive messages, formal manipulation checks of message content is not yet standard practice.…”
Section: Developed (See Chapter 8) It Aligns Withmentioning
confidence: 99%