2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00734-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking sustainable bioenergy development in Japan: decentralised system supported by local forestry biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there is growing interest in Europe, Japan, and Korea to import OP biomass to substitute fossil fuels for power generation (specifically as an alternative to coal for power generation and district heating in Japan and Korea) (Goh et al 2019), second generation liquid biofuels, packaging materials as well as drop-in and novel chemicals (Sheldon 2014;Mai-Moulin et al 2019). Furthermore, these biomass streams can be potentially converted to building blocks (e.g., sugars) for high-value chemicals or substitutes for fossil materials (e.g., bioplastics) (Zahari et al 2015).…”
Section: Output Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is growing interest in Europe, Japan, and Korea to import OP biomass to substitute fossil fuels for power generation (specifically as an alternative to coal for power generation and district heating in Japan and Korea) (Goh et al 2019), second generation liquid biofuels, packaging materials as well as drop-in and novel chemicals (Sheldon 2014;Mai-Moulin et al 2019). Furthermore, these biomass streams can be potentially converted to building blocks (e.g., sugars) for high-value chemicals or substitutes for fossil materials (e.g., bioplastics) (Zahari et al 2015).…”
Section: Output Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, such systems resonate among rural communities that have close interactions with forests with its potential advantages in forging synergies with rural revitalization and forest management. To explore the feasibility of such scenarios, Goh et al (2019) identified five key questions. This covers not only the fundamental environmental, economic, and supply-demand aspects, but also a broader consideration of human-environmental relationships and framework to assess the overall sustainability from a rural development or revitalization perspective.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Special Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that a decentralized approach with a model of introducing various feedstocks reduces the impact of the seasonality of crops by allowing multiple feedstocks to be mixed [34,37]. At the same time, the concept of using regional biomass in the bioenergy production system has shown to have socioeconomic and environmental benefits as a result of localized interaction and a secure energy supply [38][39][40]. The local utilization of agricultural residues is considered a feasible way of mitigating environmental effects when it comes to materials management [41] and it creates additional income opportunities in the farming community [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%