2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the effect of inter-gender collaboration on research performance for scholars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence is aligned with some recent international results on the study of network collaboration in the long term, where gender inequalities seem to be related to the lack of women in leadership positions (Bellotti et al, 2022). Furthermore, this phenomenon also echoes results in the postdoctoral hiring of STEMM fields, where hiring disparities correlate with between-group differences in applicants' network connections, referrer prestige, and academic human capital (Shauman and Huynh, 2023), and authors demonstrated that intergender collaboration increases male and decrease female scholar research performance (Shen et al, 2022). All in all, reflection on women in STEM has highlighted both phenomena as intervening in gender gaps in these areas of knowledge (UNESCO, 2017a,b;Thébaud and Charles, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This evidence is aligned with some recent international results on the study of network collaboration in the long term, where gender inequalities seem to be related to the lack of women in leadership positions (Bellotti et al, 2022). Furthermore, this phenomenon also echoes results in the postdoctoral hiring of STEMM fields, where hiring disparities correlate with between-group differences in applicants' network connections, referrer prestige, and academic human capital (Shauman and Huynh, 2023), and authors demonstrated that intergender collaboration increases male and decrease female scholar research performance (Shen et al, 2022). All in all, reflection on women in STEM has highlighted both phenomena as intervening in gender gaps in these areas of knowledge (UNESCO, 2017a,b;Thébaud and Charles, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Diverse research cooperation is essential for conducting breakthrough science. Previous studies have analyzed researcher collaborations and outputs from various viewpoints, including geographical [15], university [16], and research field [17], journal [18], gender [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, networking and collaboration deserve attention because there is a careful balance for women researchers to aim at. On the one hand, inter-gender collaboration may benefit male researchers more than females, especially if the male authors are at high academic level ( 26 ), but on the other hand, outputs with male authors being either first or corresponding author are more likely to describe the results in positive terms, which in turn leads to higher downstream citations ( 15 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%