2017
DOI: 10.1177/1420326x17699260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the measurement of energy poverty in Europe: A critical analysis of indicators and data

Abstract: Energy poverty – which has also been recognised via terms such as ‘fuel poverty’ and ‘energy vulnerability’ – occurs when a household experiences inadequate levels of energy services in the home. Measuring energy poverty is challenging, as it is a culturally sensitive and private condition, which is temporally and spatially dynamic. This is compounded by the limited availability of appropriate data and indicators, and lack of consensus on how energy poverty should be conceptualised and measured. Statistical in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
217
0
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(124 reference statements)
1
217
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The results support this affirmation and could be considered to contribute to mitigate the mismatch between the definition of fuel poverty and eligibility for assistance that frequently arises and increases the total costs of tackling the problem of fuel poverty (Boardman, 2010). Thomson et al (2017b) stress the need to improve the quality of existing data on fuel poverty to monitor this issue. They advocate the creation of a dedicated household survey on fuel poverty that could improve our knowledge about energy expenditure and its seasonal and annual variations, and a deeper understanding of the related problems (e.g., through changing the responses from binary to a Likert-type scale in the existing surveys).…”
Section: Policy Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results support this affirmation and could be considered to contribute to mitigate the mismatch between the definition of fuel poverty and eligibility for assistance that frequently arises and increases the total costs of tackling the problem of fuel poverty (Boardman, 2010). Thomson et al (2017b) stress the need to improve the quality of existing data on fuel poverty to monitor this issue. They advocate the creation of a dedicated household survey on fuel poverty that could improve our knowledge about energy expenditure and its seasonal and annual variations, and a deeper understanding of the related problems (e.g., through changing the responses from binary to a Likert-type scale in the existing surveys).…”
Section: Policy Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diary entries became the basis for a follow‐up conversation. Although aware of the limitations of energy diaries – in terms of the ambient temperature that underpins the capability to write, the time‐burden (Thomson et al., ), the omissions and entries that reflect the diarist's knowledge of the research aims (Meth, ) – the diary became an important source of embodied and emotional self‐reflection that facilitated access to how everyday energy‐related practices made participants feel. For example, Ryan wrote:
Since given this chore of summing up my day to day movements I realise that all I am doing to quote my cousin is ‘taking up space.’ My family have no further use for me and I have become a burden on society to the point where I rely on public housing for a place to live.
…”
Section: Research Context and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper discusses the issue of clean energy development based on these five attributes. Provided that there are some differences between fuel poverty and energy poverty, as explained by [13], some measurements of fuel poverty could be referred, such as affordability [20,21].…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Regional Clean Energy Development Amentioning
confidence: 99%