2010
DOI: 10.3828/idpr.2010.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking urban informality and the planning process in Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…My concerns, from a background in urban design, are mostly with the ways in which urban informality plays out at the level of everyday urban life with a focus on informal morphologies -the forms of informality (Dovey and King, 2011). While there are many highly insightful studies of both informal settlements and urban informality in general (Davis, 2006;Neuwirth, 2006;Huchzermeyer and Karam, 2006;Roy and Alsayyad, 2004), the complexities of informality remain under-researched and under-theorised at micro-spatial scales (Soliman, 2010). A range of writers from Turner (1976) to Brugman (2009) and Brand (2009) onwards have embraced the productivity of informal urbanism, yet we do not have any well-developed theories of how such urbanism works.…”
Section: Figure 1 Bangkokmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…My concerns, from a background in urban design, are mostly with the ways in which urban informality plays out at the level of everyday urban life with a focus on informal morphologies -the forms of informality (Dovey and King, 2011). While there are many highly insightful studies of both informal settlements and urban informality in general (Davis, 2006;Neuwirth, 2006;Huchzermeyer and Karam, 2006;Roy and Alsayyad, 2004), the complexities of informality remain under-researched and under-theorised at micro-spatial scales (Soliman, 2010). A range of writers from Turner (1976) to Brugman (2009) and Brand (2009) onwards have embraced the productivity of informal urbanism, yet we do not have any well-developed theories of how such urbanism works.…”
Section: Figure 1 Bangkokmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As Roy and AlSayyad (2004: 5) famously argued, ‘If formality operates through the fixing of value, including the mapping of spatial value, then informality operates through the constant negotiability of value and the unmapping of space’. Informality facilitated by the state or planning professionals could be incorporated into formal housing development as a way of alleviating poverty, compensating for the lack of state housing strategy in the urban sprawl (Fairbanks, 2011; Soliman, 2010). Therefore, neither legalizing nor penalizing illegal land occupation can offer a full solution to deal with informality (van Gelder, 2013).…”
Section: Processual Thinking In Urban Informalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike residential units in informal areas, an ‘ex-formal’ or ‘hybrid’ settlement consists of housing units in formal areas, which have already been built illegally or have acquired degrees of informality over time, such as the illegal increase of building heights. 6,10 The Egyptian Unified Code for Construction states that the minimum street width for urbanized areas is 10 m and that building heights must not exceed 1.5 times the street width, with a maximum height of 36 m. 11 Illegal building heights occur in larger Egyptian cities within their formal contexts, where they exceed three to four times the street width, leading to a catastrophic high-density situation. The hybrid settlements cause a significant threat to the housing market and to urban development, in addition to other complications in sanitation, health, environmental facilities and infrastructure.…”
Section: The Problem Of Daylighting and Energy Consumption Within Hybmentioning
confidence: 99%