Rethinking youth policy model in Europe and its constituents: civic learning and civic engagement

Xuan, Li

doi:10.1080/17535069.2019.1667135

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…А. М. Шербан, Т. Барбер идентифицировали модели НМП на основе особенностей концептуализации механизма политического управления молодежной сферой в программных документах, нормативноправовых актах (Şerban et al, 2018). Х.Ли предлагает в качестве универсального критерия дифференциации европейских молодежных политикдоминирующие официальные дискурсы «контроля vs заботы о молодежи» («молодежь как угроза либо надежда нации»), выделяя две модели НМП: проблемно-ориентированную и основанную на инвестициях (включающую политики расширения гражданских прав и экономического оппортунизма) (Li, 2019). А. Вальтер, напротив, фиксирует размывание границ между «мягкой» децентрализованной НМП и «жестким», стандартизированным, организованным на национальном уровне форматом управления молодежной политикой, что коррелирует с переходом европейских правительств к экспланации молодежи в качестве стратегического ресурса общества и государства (Lüküslü et al, 2015: 7, 60).…”

Section: национальные модели молодежной политикиunclassified

National Youth Policy in European Countries: Planning, Monitoring, Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

Plotichkina¹

2022

Вест. ПГУ. Политол.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article reveals the specifics of strategic planning, assessment and monitoring of national youth policies in European countries. The national models of youth policy are identified according to a number of criteria (explication of youth and its transition into adulthood, the system of social security). Youth policy measures implemented by countries in response to the COVID-19 crisis are characterized. The article describes the quality standards of national youth strategies proposed by international organizations (OECD) and the initiatives of different countries in formulating, implementing, and controlling programs and plans for the development of the youth sphere. National youth strategies are cross-sectoral, integrated, and focus on different policy areas. Intersectoral cooperation ensures integration and rational coordination of actions in the framework of youth policy. The sustainability and effectiveness of policy depend on the systematic collection of data disaggregated by age and the integration of youth studies into the development and decision-making process. The effectiveness of youth policy monitoring is ensured through the clear formulation of control indicators for progress in achieving the set goals in the youth sector. The involvement of various stakeholders, primarily young citizens, at all stages of the political cycle in making decisions on youth issues is a significant factor in an inclusive policy model

show abstract

Section: национальные модели молодежной политикиunclassified

National Youth Policy in European Countries: Planning, Monitoring, Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

Plotichkina¹

2022

Вест. ПГУ. Политол.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most successful idea that focuses against violence and bullying is "No one should be unkind or hurtful" (Woolley, 2019). What has more influence than the curriculum are extracurricular activities, such as discussions with parents on civic, political and civically responsible activities (Li, 2020). Parents are the most important actors in students' civic activities (Muddiman et al, 2019); moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly changed teachers', students' and their parents' everyday lives across the globe.…”

Section: Cyberbullying As Upcoming Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Students’ Citizenship Activities and Bullying at School

Čekse¹,

Geske²,

Kiris³

2021

Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

School violence and bullying highlighted as a global issue outside and in the school. In this research, IEA International Civic and Citizenship Study (ICCS) 2016 data from eight countries – Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia), the Russian Federation, Sweden and Denmark – was compared. The aim of the article is to observe the relationship between bullying and students’ citizenship activities at school and in the future. The research determined a relationship between bullying and factors that described students’ citizenship activities. The results show that there is a link between bullying and students’ experiences of participation in illegal and legal activities, participation in classroom discussions, interest in the wider community, and at-school citizenship activities. This article was supported by research application no. 1.1.1.2/VIAA/1/16/020, and European Social Fund project No. 8.3.6.2/17/I/001.

show abstract

Interplay between civic engagement, political trust, and support for democracy: Insights from a study on youth students at Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Abebe,

Admassu,

Belayneh

2024

Social Sciences & Humanities Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rethinking youth policy model in Europe and its constituents: civic learning and civic engagement

Cited by 3 publications

References 20 publications

National Youth Policy in European Countries: Planning, Monitoring, Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

National Youth Policy in European Countries: Planning, Monitoring, Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

The Relationship Between Students’ Citizenship Activities and Bullying at School

Interplay between civic engagement, political trust, and support for democracy: Insights from a study on youth students at Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About