“…A wide range of studies, such as the application of sophisticated hidden‐state state‐dependent diversification models to infer the relationships among polyploidy, breeding system evolution, and diversification (Zenil‐Ferguson et al ., 2019), or the investigation of the time‐dependency of polyploid diversification in a model like that of Freyman & Höhna (2018b), testing whether polyploids, if they survive an initial period of high extinction, tend to then diversify at elevated rates (Mayrose et al ., 2011; Tank et al ., 2015; Landis et al ., 2018), would all gain a greater biological realism and precision by the adoption of a polyploid phylogenetics approach. Some of these applications are already available, such as character state reconstruction on networks (Bastide et al ., 2018), which has resulted in novel insights that would not have been attainable if the researchers based their reconstructions on bifurcating trees (Karimi et al ., 2019). Others, however, including the inference of allopolyploidisation in a BiSSE‐like framework, await the development of a fully integrated tree model that models polyploidisations alongside speciation and extinction (some components of this model are available, e.g.…”