1949
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(49)90894-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal and Vascular Damage in Long-Standing Diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1949
1949
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation of this postulated metabolie disturbance to hyperglyccemia and its therapeutic control with insulin is of the greatest importance in the prevention and treatment of the vascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Although many authors have suggested that control of hyperglyccemia reduces the frequency of complications (Mann et alii, 1949;Wilson et alii, 1951), there is considerable evidence that control of hyperglyccemia alone does not materially affect the course of diabetic vascular disease (Dolger, 1947;Croom and Scott, 1949 ;Gilliland, 1951). This is borne out by the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The relation of this postulated metabolie disturbance to hyperglyccemia and its therapeutic control with insulin is of the greatest importance in the prevention and treatment of the vascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Although many authors have suggested that control of hyperglyccemia reduces the frequency of complications (Mann et alii, 1949;Wilson et alii, 1951), there is considerable evidence that control of hyperglyccemia alone does not materially affect the course of diabetic vascular disease (Dolger, 1947;Croom and Scott, 1949 ;Gilliland, 1951). This is borne out by the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…It is widely accepted that the normal venous-arteriolar ratio is 3: 2. The uniform distension or turgescence of the larger veins was first noted by Mylius (1937) who noticed that the venous-arteriolar ratio was commonly increased to 4 : 2 in diabetic fundi and this ratio has been confirmed in many diabetics by other observers (Ballantyne & Michaelson 1947, Croom & Scott 1949). These observations were, however, based on ophthalmoscopic examination and therefore presumably open to a large degree of observer error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As for diabetic retinopathy,-Ballantyne (1946) stated: " The outstanding paradox is the lack of any apparent relation between the severity of the diabetes, the control of the condition by treatment, and the presence or absence of retinal changes." Ballantyne's opinion is endorsed by Wagener (1945) and by Croom and Scott (1949).…”
Section: Complications and Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%