2022
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100820-114239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal Encoding of Natural Scenes

Abstract: An ultimate goal in retina science is to understand how the neural circuit of the retina processes natural visual scenes. Yet most studies in laboratories have long been performed with simple, artificial visual stimuli such as full-field illumination, spots of light, or gratings. The underlying assumption is that the features of the retina thus identified carry over to the more complex scenario of natural scenes. As the application of corresponding natural settings is becoming more commonplace in experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modelling of retinal responses to natural stimuli has advanced our understanding of the complexity of retinal processing in recent years. As suggested in a recent review, it is helpful to consider the contributions of different studies in terms of one of three perspectives on the retinal encoding of natural scenes: The circuit perspective (“how?”), the normative perspective (“why?”), and the coding perspective (“what?”) (69). For example, an in-silico dissection of a CNN model of the retina offered explanations on how the surprisingly complex retinal computations, such as motion reversal, omitted stimulus response, and polarity reversal, emerge from simpler computations within retinal circuits (26, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modelling of retinal responses to natural stimuli has advanced our understanding of the complexity of retinal processing in recent years. As suggested in a recent review, it is helpful to consider the contributions of different studies in terms of one of three perspectives on the retinal encoding of natural scenes: The circuit perspective (“how?”), the normative perspective (“why?”), and the coding perspective (“what?”) (69). For example, an in-silico dissection of a CNN model of the retina offered explanations on how the surprisingly complex retinal computations, such as motion reversal, omitted stimulus response, and polarity reversal, emerge from simpler computations within retinal circuits (26, 27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the natural retinal input is dynamically structured by eye and head movements that rapidly shift the retinal image (Land, 2015). Large gaze shifts can induce response transients at fixation onset in neurons at the early stages of the visual system (Miura and Scanziani, 2022; Noda and Adey, 1974), and natural inputs drive nonlinear retinal processing (Heitman et al, 2016; Karamanlis et al, 2022; Shah et al, 2020; Turner and Rieke, 2016; Turner et al, 2018; Yu et al, 2022), which is currently missing from models of efficient coding. Here, we sought to study whether stimulus correlations in gaze-based natural movies are efficiently discarded by the retina.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of our understanding of the retina’s neural code is at a single-cell level based on responses to artificial stimuli, like drifting gratings [20, 68]. It is less well understood how natural stimuli are encoded by the population activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important, as our gaze only remains fixed for a fraction of a second, before rapid saccadic eye movements induce a new visual scene onto the retina [66,67]. Most of our understanding of the retina's neural code is at a single-cell level based on responses to artificial stimuli, like drifting gratings [20,68]. It is less well understood how natural stimuli are encoded by the population activity.…”
Section: Emergence Of a Relative Spike Latency Code And Stimulus Omis...mentioning
confidence: 99%