2014
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinofugal projections in the mouse

Abstract: The laboratory mouse is increasingly a subject for visual system investigation, but there has been no comprehensive evaluation of this species’ visual projections. Here, projections were visualized and mapped following intraocular injection of cholera toxin B subunit. Tissue was processed using standard procedures applied to 30 Am free floating sections with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. The mouse retina projects to approximately 46 brain regions, including 14 not previously described in this species. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
199
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
14
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is unclear to what extent the properties of light responses vary between the distinct subclasses of M1-type pRGCs that project to the SCN and the OPN, and how these responses may be tailored to meet the different physiological roles performed by these cells. Indeed it should be noted that in total, pRGC innervations are detected for as many as 32 distinct brain regions, 32,33,80 and in the majority of these cases the subtypes of pRGCs innervating these areas, and the specific properties of light responses transmitted to these regions has received little attention. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of the melanopsin phototransduction signalling pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is unclear to what extent the properties of light responses vary between the distinct subclasses of M1-type pRGCs that project to the SCN and the OPN, and how these responses may be tailored to meet the different physiological roles performed by these cells. Indeed it should be noted that in total, pRGC innervations are detected for as many as 32 distinct brain regions, 32,33,80 and in the majority of these cases the subtypes of pRGCs innervating these areas, and the specific properties of light responses transmitted to these regions has received little attention. There are also significant gaps in our understanding of the melanopsin phototransduction signalling pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral thalami receive inputs from tectal-pretectal pathways, such as the superior colliculus, lateral geniculate nucleus, reticular thalamus, and direct retinal inputs (Morin & Studholme, 2014;Thompson & Robertson, 1987). The superior colliculus rests within secondary visual pathways often associated with the production of movements that orient, or reflexively attend, a subject toward visual targets (Grieve et al, 2000;Milnar & Goodale, 1984;Reep & Corwin, 2009), but these pathways have also been linked to a high degree of multi-modal processing, especially from somatosensory cues, which in rodents stem from the vibrissae (Bezdudnaya & Keller, 2008;Cooper et al, 1998;Robertson et al, 1980;Weldon & Best, 1992).…”
Section: Subregions and Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the SCN is the only region in the mouse brain that receives nearly equal inputs from the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes. This is quite surprising because all other retinorecipient brain regions are innervated ∼95% contralaterally (23). The importance of and the mechanism of how the SCN receives equal input from both eyes are essentially unexplored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, this simple demarcation of the SCN was challenged by studies showing that the entire mouse SCN receives dense innervation from ipRGCs (11). Because of the dense retinal innervation pattern, it has been difficult to decipher the identity of SCN neurons innervated by ipRGCs (22)(23)(24). Therefore, little is known about which cell types in the SCN receive retinal input.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%