2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinotopic mapping of visual event-related potentials

Abstract: Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:Biological Psychology 118 (2016) ABSTRACTVisual stimulation is frequently employed in electroencephalographic (EEG) research.However, despite its widespread use, no studies have thoroughly evaluated how the morphology of the visual event-related potentials (ERPs) varies according to the spatial location of stimuli. Hence, the purpose of this study was to perform a detailed retinotopic mapping of v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
61
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
13
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each input matrix (one for PN1 and another for PN2) consisted of 59 variables (i.e., EEG channels) and 2,652 cases (i.e., participants × stimulus category × stimulus location). In this case, no restrictions were introduced for factor selection besides the scree test, since some relevant components may present both anterior and posterior scalp maxima for different stimulus locations (e.g., P2: Capilla et al, ). PN1 and PN2 SF scores, which consist of a single value per SF (involving several electrodes) and are linearly related to amplitudes, were then submitted to a subsequent PCA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each input matrix (one for PN1 and another for PN2) consisted of 59 variables (i.e., EEG channels) and 2,652 cases (i.e., participants × stimulus category × stimulus location). In this case, no restrictions were introduced for factor selection besides the scree test, since some relevant components may present both anterior and posterior scalp maxima for different stimulus locations (e.g., P2: Capilla et al, ). PN1 and PN2 SF scores, which consist of a single value per SF (involving several electrodes) and are linearly related to amplitudes, were then submitted to a subsequent PCA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To different extents, retinotopy extends to the visual extrastriate cortices and ventral and dorsal visual pathways (Sereno & Tootell, ). This retinotopy is reflected in event‐related potentials (ERPs), where the spatial location of the stimulation has a clear and direct reflection in the amplitude and polarity of visual components, particularly in the 80–250 ms interval: C1, P1, N1, and P2 (e.g., Capilla et al, ; Clark, Fan, & Hillyard, ). This stimulus location‐related variability of ERPs has been observed in response to nonemotional (checkerboards) stimuli, so it is independent of emotional load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). It is well established by combined fMRI and VEP methods that PO3, PO4 and nearby electrodes isolate striate cortical responses, while P7, P8, PO7, PO8 and their neighbours pick up human extra-striate cortical areas 18,193334 (see Discussion).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Both our mfPOP and mfVEP methods present onset stimuli. Capilla et al 34. used a 60 region, M-scaled, mfVEP stimulus presented within 22° of fixation and a 10–10 EEG array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%