Handbook of the Protists 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retortamonadida (with Notes on Carpediemonas-Like Organisms and Caviomonadidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Giardia intestinalis (figure 2), but statistical support was equivocal (MLBP 56%; BPP 0.86). This possible affinity between Barthelona and fornicates in the SSU rDNA phylogeny is provocative, as both lineages thrive in oxygen-poor environments and possess double-membrane-bounded MROs instead of typical mitochondria (see figure 4a for the putative MRO in strain PAP020) [43][44][45][46][47][48]. Thus, we took a phylogenomic approach to resolve the position of barthelonids more robustly within the tree of eukaryotes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Giardia intestinalis (figure 2), but statistical support was equivocal (MLBP 56%; BPP 0.86). This possible affinity between Barthelona and fornicates in the SSU rDNA phylogeny is provocative, as both lineages thrive in oxygen-poor environments and possess double-membrane-bounded MROs instead of typical mitochondria (see figure 4a for the putative MRO in strain PAP020) [43][44][45][46][47][48]. Thus, we took a phylogenomic approach to resolve the position of barthelonids more robustly within the tree of eukaryotes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), but statistical support was equivocal (MLBP 56%; BPP 0.86). This possible affinity between Barthelona and fornicates in the SSU rDNA phylogeny is provocative, as both lineages thrive in oxygen-poor environments and possess double-membrane bound MROs instead of typical mitochondria (Simpson and Patterson 1999; Tovar et al 2003; Yubuki et al 2007; Yubuki et al 2013; Kulda et al 2017; see Fig. S2 for the putative MRO in strain PAP020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Retortamonads fall into two separate groups among Fornicata, with vertebrate commensals R. caviae and R. dobelli branching sister to Diplomonada. A, schematic tree based on SSU rDNA phylogeny from [ 1 ], also corroborated by multi-gene analyses [ 2 ]. B, phase-contrast light micrographs of retortamonads from this work; scale bar = 2 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recurrent flagellum is decorated by lateral vanes, passes through the cytostomal pouch and propels food particles into the cytopharynx, whereas the smooth anterior flagellum (or flagella) serves cell locomotion. Under adverse conditions or to disperse, Retortamonadida retract their flagella, develop a sturdy cell wall composed of filamentous material, and encyst [ 1 ]. Despite having ultrastructural similarities, Retortamonadida are polyphyletic, with Chilomastix and insect Retortamonas species being sister lineages and branching among Carpediemonas -like organisms, whereas Retortamonas species from vertebrate hosts are in fact sister to Diplomonadida ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation