Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3450569.3463565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ReTRACe: Revocable and Traceable Blockchain Rewrites using Attribute-based Cryptosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…× × TLL20 [24] × × PVM21 [25] × × JSZ21 [26] × × × XNMX21 [27] × × XNMX22 [15] × × RBDS22 [18] × Ours To solve the above problem, we propose a policy-hidden fine-grained redactable blockchain scheme (named PFRB) in decentralized blockchain-based IoT systems. In PFRB, users can enjoy blockchain services while hiding their policies.…”
Section: Fine-grainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…× × TLL20 [24] × × PVM21 [25] × × JSZ21 [26] × × × XNMX21 [27] × × XNMX22 [15] × × RBDS22 [18] × Ours To solve the above problem, we propose a policy-hidden fine-grained redactable blockchain scheme (named PFRB) in decentralized blockchain-based IoT systems. In PFRB, users can enjoy blockchain services while hiding their policies.…”
Section: Fine-grainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panwar et al proposed a permissioned redactable blockchain that provides traceability and revocability through the use of dynamic group signature schemes (DGSS) and revocable FAME (RFAME). While their solution links modified transactions to their modifiers and offers revocation of malicious modification privileges, the traceability only offers weak accountability, and the revocation mechanism has a linear complexity with the size of non-revoked modifiers [25].…”
Section: Cp-abe Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tian et al proposed the PCH-based redactable blockchain with accountability, which links the modified transaction to its modifier but not the key leakage [24]. Additionally, Panwar et al introduced a permissioned redactable blockchain with traceability and revocability by combining dynamic group signature and FAME, but their solution only provides weak accountability that links the modified transaction to its modifier but not producers of the pirate decoder [25]. To achieve strong accountability, the traceability object in this paper is the collude producers, named traitors, of the pirate decoder that allows the unauthorized to rewrite transactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Derler et al [11] proposed the policy-based chameleon hashes (PCH), which refers to the ability of anyone with all the permissions required by a policy to have the ability to compute arbitrary collisions for a given hash and hence enables fne-grained and controlled editing at the transaction level. Subsequently, accountability [12], revocation [13], supervision [14], and k-time [15] are embedded to make the editable scheme be more relevant to practical applications.…”
Section: Redactable Schemementioning
confidence: 99%