2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-019-01667-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: An integrated approach towards automated software requirements elicitation from unstructured documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alsolai et al [55] conducted an empirical evaluation to find the impact of feature selection techniques, ensemble models, and sampling techniques implemented on seven data sets for predicting change-proneness using different source code metrics. However, Murugesh et al [56] discussed automated software requirements using machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Logistic Regression (Lr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alsolai et al [55] conducted an empirical evaluation to find the impact of feature selection techniques, ensemble models, and sampling techniques implemented on seven data sets for predicting change-proneness using different source code metrics. However, Murugesh et al [56] discussed automated software requirements using machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Logistic Regression (Lr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the preparation methods of requirements specification documents mainly include the manual preparation of Unified Modeling Language (UML), generation of requirements specifications based on extraction rules [5,6] and automatic generation of requirements specifications based on natural language processing [7]. Although manual preparation has a strong personalized customization ability to generate demand specifications, it is usually difficult to solve the problems of cumbersome manual preparation, being error prone and difficulty communicating effectively with business personnel, which are easily affected by the subjective ability of the writer [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%