2011
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2011.287
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: MEK inhibition enhances ABT-737-induced leukemia cell apoptosis via prevention of ERK-activated MCL-1 induction and modulation of MCL-1/BIM complex

Abstract: Recently, strategies for AML therapy have been developed that target anti-apoptotic BCL2 family members using BH3 mimetic drugs such as ABT-737. Though effective against BCL2 and BCL-XL, ABT-737 poorly inhibits MCL-1. Here we report that, unexpectedly, ABT-737 induces activation of ERK and induction of MCL-1 in AML cells. MEK inhibitors such as PD0325901 and CI-1040 have been used successfully to suppress MCL-1. We report that PD0325901 blocked ABT-737 –induced MCL-1 expression and when combined with ABT-737 r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Navitoclax did not alter ERK or p90RSK phosphorylation, and the effects of MEK inhibition on ERK and RSK phosphorylation as well as BIM stabilization are comparable following combination treatment compared with the single-agent G-963. At early time points, MCL1 levels increase in navitoclax treated cells and decrease in G-963-treated cells, and the effect is balanced out in the combination treatment setting, similar to an effect previously observed in AML models with ABT-737 and MEK inhibition (25). Overall, signaling downstream of MEK does not seem to be impacted by navitoclax, but there is enhanced PARP cleavage in all cell lines treated with the combination compared with either single-agent (Fig.…”
Section: Mek Inhibition Results In Increased Bim Across a Panel Of Krsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Navitoclax did not alter ERK or p90RSK phosphorylation, and the effects of MEK inhibition on ERK and RSK phosphorylation as well as BIM stabilization are comparable following combination treatment compared with the single-agent G-963. At early time points, MCL1 levels increase in navitoclax treated cells and decrease in G-963-treated cells, and the effect is balanced out in the combination treatment setting, similar to an effect previously observed in AML models with ABT-737 and MEK inhibition (25). Overall, signaling downstream of MEK does not seem to be impacted by navitoclax, but there is enhanced PARP cleavage in all cell lines treated with the combination compared with either single-agent (Fig.…”
Section: Mek Inhibition Results In Increased Bim Across a Panel Of Krsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Cragg and colleagues showed BIM-dependent combination efficacy of a MEK inhibitor and ABT-737, a compound with similar biochemical activity to navitoclax, in several BRAF mutant models (12). Konopleva and colleagues showed similar combination efficacy in AML models (25). In this work, we set out to determine the effectiveness of a navitoclax/MEK inhibitor combination in a large panel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma derived cell lines with the aim of (1) determining the prevalence of MEK inhibitor/navitoclax synergy in cancer lines that frequently harbor activating KRAS mutations, (2) identifying predictive biomarkers for the combination in these cancers, and (3) evaluating combination mechanism of action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…ABT-737, an agent that disrupts microtubules, has the best synergistic effect with IRAK1/4 inhibitor in killing T-ALL cells due to the combination of BCL2 and BCL-xL impairment by ABT-737 and the dramatic decrease of MCL1 levels by IRAK1/4 inhibitor. 7,[10][11][12] Despite the improvement in cytotoxic effect on malignant T-ALL cells by the combination of the IRAK1/4 inhibitor and ABT-737, a nanoparticle based drug delivery system has been proven to increase the effect of chemotherapy drugs through enhancing permeability and retention in tumor cells, improving pharmacokinetic profiles, and reducing side effects. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Therefore, here we co-encapsulated IRAK1/4 inhibitor and ABT-737 into biodegradable and biocompatible polyethylene glycol (PEG) modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PEG-PLGA) polymer nanoparticles (IRAK/ABT-NP) as a novel and advanced therapy strategy for T-ALL treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…На сегодняшний день известны внутриклеточные протеинкиназы и транскрипционные факторы, ко-торые принимают участие в механизме лекарствен-ной устойчивости лейкозных клеток, к ним относят следующие сигнальные белки: mTOR, PI3K, ABL1, FLT3, JAK2, митоген-активируемые протеинкиназы (MAPK) и фактор, индуцируемый гипоксией (HIF-1) [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Все эти сигнальные белки так-же могут участвовать в механизмах de novo лекар-ственной устойчивости клеток ОМЛ.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified