RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pushing low-carbon mobility: a survey experiment on the public acceptance of disruptive policy packages

Thaller, Annina; Wicki, Michael; Fleiß, Eva; Maier, Raphaela; Posch, Alfred

doi:10.1080/14693062.2023.2182755

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To address absolute support levels [Druckman and Green, 2021], public support is commonly measured using 'ratings' methodologies [e.g., Fesenfeld, Wicki, Sun et al, 2020;Pianta, Rinscheid, and Weber, 2021;Thaller, Wicki, Fleiß et al, 2023]. Within ratings measurements, respondents are generally asked to evaluate their support for both policy proposals within a choice set on a scale (e.g., 1-5 or 1-7 Likert scales).…”

Section: Policy Proposal Response Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Absolute and Relative Levels of Policy Support using Conjoint Choice Experiments

Smith,

Kolcava

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public support is a crucial, often necessary, component of political feasibility for policy proposals. Conjoint experiments are commonly utilised to assess support for policies, particularly how public opinion varies by specific policy instruments, and packaged designs. Yet, while robust methodologies have been identified to compare relative levels of support between policy instruments, current strategies often limit substantive interpretations of the absolute level of support. Given the importance of majority support thresholds across democratic settings, identifying absolute levels of support can provide critical information when assessing the feasibility of policy proposals. Here, we empirically explore a simple methodological advancement -- how do estimations of relative and absolute levels of support vary by discrete choice, proposal vote and binary ratings response methods? Drawing upon evaluations of support for carbon taxation in the United States as a case study, we find that similar levels of relative support can be found across response methods, but that the absolute level varies substantially by method and whether abstention is allowed. We further evaluate response methods by efficiency and consistency, to develop a set of recommendations towards utilising multiple response items to simultaneously assess relative and absolute levels of support for policies in conjoint-experimental designs.

show abstract

Section: Policy Proposal Response Methodologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Absolute and Relative Levels of Policy Support using Conjoint Choice Experiments

Smith,

Kolcava

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Second, carbon taxes provide a distinct price signal to businesses and households, allowing them to make more informed choices in their purchases and investments. Thaller et al's [36] research shows that when provided with transparent detailed information on carbon pricing, consumers and businesses are more likely to take energy-saving measures and increase investments in technologies energy saving. Therefore, carbon taxes can increase their influence on consumer behavior by providing accurate price signals.…”

Section: B Carbon Tax Policy Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Role of Carbon Taxes in Driving Low-Carbon Transformations: A Comparative Analysis of Implementation Policies

Putri,

Werastuti,

Rustiarini

et al. 2024

IJSDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovations in the utilization of alternative energy sources to replace coal and oil-based production methods have a direct impact on the volume of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions released into the atmosphere and subsequently contributing to the greenhouse effect. Addressing these negative externalities of greenhouse gas emissions is most effectively achieved through a universal global carbon tax system applied uniformly across all nations. This study seeks to explore the implementation of a carbon tax as an alternative policy for curbing carbon emissions and promoting a transition to a sustainable green economy. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a focus on comparative analysis, examining carbon tax policies across various countries in Europe, America, and Asia. Research data was primarily gathered through an extensive review of relevant literature, with a major data source being the World Bank's reports on the status and trends of carbon pricing. The study's findings underscore the efficacy of a carbon tax as a policy instrument to reduce carbon emissions. Furthermore, it has the potential to induce shifts in both household and industrial decisionmaking behaviors, leading to reduced energy consumption with high emissions. Ultimately, this policy approach can foster sustainable development and facilitate the transition to a green economy characterized by low-carbon practices, resource efficiency, and social inclusivity. These policies are instrumental in addressing environmental and social challenges, thus safeguarding the well-being of future generations.

show abstract

How attractive is the participation in a Living Lab study? Experimental evidence and recommendations

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Living Labs, which are urban sites that include households and workplaces and are used to study the real-time use of technological innovations and devices, have become increasingly popular among environmental scientists to gain insights into energy consumption in peoples’ everyday life. However, recruiting a viable number of participants for such studies can pose a challenge to researchers: Factors like month-long study durations and the requirements to handle smart technology proficiently or frequently exchange information with researchers and other users do not necessarily make participation attractive for everyone. To identify relevant factors for participation, we conducted three large preregistered surveys (total N = 1479) in Austria: two conjoint studies and one experimental study. We found that advertising a Living Lab with a shorter duration (less than a month), providing the option to participate from home, and—a crucial point—offering financial incentives should be considered when considering promotion strategies and conducting thorough study planning. However, we discuss the fact that there might be a risk of selection bias for technic-savvy and future-oriented people.

show abstract

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pushing low-carbon mobility: a survey experiment on the public acceptance of disruptive policy packages

Cited by 3 publications

References 49 publications

Measuring Absolute and Relative Levels of Policy Support using Conjoint Choice Experiments

Measuring Absolute and Relative Levels of Policy Support using Conjoint Choice Experiments

Assessing the Role of Carbon Taxes in Driving Low-Carbon Transformations: A Comparative Analysis of Implementation Policies

How attractive is the participation in a Living Lab study? Experimental evidence and recommendations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About