2018
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b1700516
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for breast cancer liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic resection (HR) for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLMs). Methods: Studies that had examined the outcomes for both RFA and HR for BCLM were identified by searching the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Pooled analyzes of the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and short-term outcomes of BCLM were performed. Results: Patients with BCLM gained many more survival b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For non‐CRLMs, there was a comparative cohort study of patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer and a meta‐analysis of retrospective cohort studies of patients with liver metastases from breast cancer 101,102 . In the gastric cancer study, OS and DFS after HR were statistically significantly better than after ABT 101 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For non‐CRLMs, there was a comparative cohort study of patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer and a meta‐analysis of retrospective cohort studies of patients with liver metastases from breast cancer 101,102 . In the gastric cancer study, OS and DFS after HR were statistically significantly better than after ABT 101 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101 In the breast cancer study, HR was better than ABT for the 3-year DFS and OS. 102 Currently, there are no comparison studies that show ABT is better than HR for patients with non-CRLM.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head to head trials are lacking, though there is some evidence that the combination appears to be safe and superior to RFA alone [59]. A meta-analysis of 14 studies evaluated the efficacy of RFA compared to hepatic resection and found the latter group to be more efficacious (combined OR for 5 year OS 0.38, p<0.001) [60].…”
Section: Liver Metastasectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean±standard deviation (SD), while non-normally distributed variables were presented as median±interquartile range (IQR) (Xiao et al, 2018). Categorical variables were presented as frequency and proportions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%