2022
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2778
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Auditory perceptual learning in autistic adults

Abstract: The automatic retuning of phoneme categories to better adapt to the speech of a novel talker has been extensively documented across various (neurotypical) populations, including both adults and children. However, no studies have examined auditory perceptual learning effects in populations atypical in perceptual, social, and language processing for communication, such as populations with autism. Employing a classic lexically-guided perceptual learning paradigm, the present study investigated perceptual learning… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sentence production and rating tasks, participants need to process higher‐level complex stimuli by a novel talker, which requires vigorous integration of bottom‐up and top‐down processes (Heald & Nusbaum, 2014; Kleinschmidt & Jaeger, 2015). It has been reported that autistic adults show delayed auditory feedback during speech production (Lin et al, 2015), and they also lack perceptual adaptation to novel talkers (Alispahic et al, 2022). Other studies have also shown atypical semantic processing (Ahtam et al, 2020; Grisoni et al, 2019; Kamio et al, 2007; O'Rourke & Coderre, 2021) and reduced top‐down modulation during online semantic processing in autism (Henderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our sentence production and rating tasks, participants need to process higher‐level complex stimuli by a novel talker, which requires vigorous integration of bottom‐up and top‐down processes (Heald & Nusbaum, 2014; Kleinschmidt & Jaeger, 2015). It has been reported that autistic adults show delayed auditory feedback during speech production (Lin et al, 2015), and they also lack perceptual adaptation to novel talkers (Alispahic et al, 2022). Other studies have also shown atypical semantic processing (Ahtam et al, 2020; Grisoni et al, 2019; Kamio et al, 2007; O'Rourke & Coderre, 2021) and reduced top‐down modulation during online semantic processing in autism (Henderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area of speech perception, Alispahic at al. (2022) tested autistic and neurotypical adults on the perception of fricative categories in Australian English (e.g., /f/-/s/) 65 . Consistent with our current results, their perceptual recalibration experiment revealed intact categorization of unambiguous instances of phonemes but reduced adaptation in response to exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such links may pave the way for “embodied” transfer effects, such as potential parallels between sensitivity to nonverbal communicative cues (e.g., back-channeling) across domains (Glenberg & Gallese, 2012; Hadley & Pickering, 2020; Levinson, 2016; Matyja & Schiavio, 2013; Moran et al, 2015). Individual differences in such cross-domain capacities may, moreover, be associated with more general socio-cognitive capacities related to aspects of personality, including empathy and emotional intelligence (Alispahic et al, 2022; Atkinson, 2002; Resnicow et al, 2004). New evidence on how such socio-cognitive capacities might be involved in language processes is continuously emerging (Franich et al, 2021; Herringshaw et al, 2016; Venker et al, 2019).…”
Section: Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%