2023
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-230694
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Deep learning based two-fold segmentation model for liver tumor detection

Abstract: Liver Tumour (LT) develops when healthy cells undergo abnormal DNA changes that cause them to grow and divide uncontrollably. In manual examination, evaluation might be changed by the unique perception of the observers, which depends on their expertise and subjectivity. Therefore, computer-aided intelligent tools are established to eliminate subjectivity and increase the performance. To overcome these challenges, a novel Two-fold Segmentation of Liver Tumour (TFSLT) model for accurately detecting the liver tum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the DNN is used for classification based on segmentation outcomes. Anandan et al [35] presented the enhanced filtering approach called NMADF that helps filter the input CT scan images. The proposed approach uses the two-fold segmentation that segments the liver cancer images.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the DNN is used for classification based on segmentation outcomes. Anandan et al [35] presented the enhanced filtering approach called NMADF that helps filter the input CT scan images. The proposed approach uses the two-fold segmentation that segments the liver cancer images.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of noise and filters is based on measuring image quality values. There are four image quality measurements, namely Mean Square Error (MSE) [12]- [13], Peak Signal Noise Ratio (PSNR) [14]- [16], Variation of Information (VOI) [17]- [18], and Global Consistency Error (GCE) [19]- [21]. The smaller the MSE value, the better the recovery value from the noise effect, and in PSNR the higher the value, the better because it is considered close to the original image.…”
Section: ) Noise Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%