2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6473393
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Effects of Valsartan on LN, FN, MDA, Renal Tissue Fibrosis, and Inflammatory Infiltration in DN Rats

Abstract: The effects of valsartan on laminin (LN), fibronectin (FN), malondialdehyde (MDA), renal tissue fibrosis, and inflammatory infiltration in diabetic nephropathy (DN) rats are explored. A total of 42 SPF male Sprague D (SD) rats are selected and randomly divided into normal set, model set, valsartan low-dose and high-dose sets, and metformin set with 7 rats in each set. The kidney tissue of all rats is collected after administration. The standard of protein mRNA in kidney tissues is detected by real-time fluores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 34 ]. The above mechanism could highlight the fact that a relatively large dose of valsartan combined with other treatments induces improvements in clinical complications [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 34 ]. The above mechanism could highlight the fact that a relatively large dose of valsartan combined with other treatments induces improvements in clinical complications [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%