2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/3535195
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Interpolation Parameters in Inverse Distance‐Weighted Interpolation Algorithm on DEM Interpolation Error

Abstract: Although DEM occupies an important basic position in spatial analysis, so far, the quality of DEM modeling has still not reached a satisfactory accuracy. This research mainly discusses the influence of interpolation parameters in the inverse distance-weighted interpolation algorithm on the DEM interpolation error. The interpolation parameters to be studied in this paper are the number of search points, the search direction, and the smoothness factor. In order to study the optimization of IDW parameters, the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study highlights similar results for the inverse distance-weighted interpolation, whose optimum parameters depend on the study area [14].…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study highlights similar results for the inverse distance-weighted interpolation, whose optimum parameters depend on the study area [14].…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This error is expressed in radians because of the geographic CRS. 𝑒 (𝑙, 𝑝) = 𝑑 (𝑙, 𝑝) − 𝑠 λ 𝑒 (𝑙, 𝑝) = 𝑑 (𝑙, 𝑝) − 𝑠 (11) Then, the error is converted in metres ( 12) by considering the radius of the WGS84 ellipsoid at given latitude φ (13) and (14).…”
Section: Error Matrices and Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse distance weighting (IDW) method assigns weights as per the distance of known points, that is, the weight is inversely proportional to the distance. The closer the predicted point to the known point, the greater the assigned weight (Liu et al, 2021;Wen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Interpolation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse distance weighting (IDW) method assigns weights as per the distance of known points, that is, the weight is inversely proportional to the distance. The closer the predicted point to the known point, the greater the assigned weight (Liu et al, 2021; Wen et al, 2022). Further, the spline function method is used to generate a smooth surface by limiting the range of the surrounding data points, selecting a mathematical function that expresses spatial variation, and assigning values to unknown points, in which the interpolation results of the tensile spline function (TS) are more closely restricted to the range of values of the sample points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the underestimation caused by missing ozone data, we corrected the AOT40 values to account for full-time coverage (Text S3 in Supporting Information S1). And then, we utilized the inverse distance-weighted spatial interpolation method (Liu et al, 2021), a commonly used approach, to estimate AOT40 values among the 10 km grid cells. Previous studies have used AOT40 to assess the adverse effects of ozone on vegetation in China (Hu et al, 2023;Ren et al, 2011), implicating the effectivity of the AOT40 value in assessing ozone pollution's impact on NPP.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%