“…One hypothetical advantage associated with the use of mGlu receptor ligands is the lack of the adverse effects typically induced by NMDA or AMPA receptor antagonists, such as sedation, ataxia, and severe learning impairment Bruno et al, 2001). Of the eight known mGlu receptor subtypes, mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors are the best candidates as "neuroprotective receptors," because their activation inhibits glutamate release (Lovinger, 1991;Lovinger and McCool, 1995;Battaglia et al, 1997;Cozzi et al, 1997), inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels (for review, see Pin and Duvoisin, 1995), positively modulates potassium channels (Sharon et al, 1997), and stimulates the production of neurotrophic factors in astrocytes and microglia (Bruno et al, 1997(Bruno et al, , 1998bCiccarelli et al, 1999;D'Onofrio et al, 2001;Matarredona et al, 2001). Early in vitro studies have shown that first generation agonists of mGlu2 and mGlu3, such as (2S,1ЈS,2ЈS)-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine and (2S,2ЈR,3ЈR)-2-(2Ј,3Ј-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine, are protective against excitotoxicity and other neuronal insults (Pizzi et al, 1993;Bruno et al, 1994Bruno et al, , 1995Ambrosini et al, 1995;Buisson and Choi, 1995;Thomsen et al, 1996).…”