2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6659701
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Potential Drug Prediction of Glioblastoma Based on Drug Perturbation‐Induced Gene Expression Signatures

Abstract: Objectives. Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor which is the most common and aggressive type of central nervous system cancer, with high morbidity and mortality. Despite lots of systematic studies on the molecular mechanism of glioblastoma, the pathogenesis is still unclear, and effective therapies are relatively rare with surgical resection as the frequently therapeutic intervention. Identification of fundamental molecules and gene networks associated with initiation is critical in glioblastoma drug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of glioma-related genes obtained from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database were predicted to be regulated by 15 miRNAs via the miRwalk 2.0 database [ 22 ]. Zhu and colleagues [ 23 ] provided a framework of workflow for potential therapeutic drug discovery and predicted 10 potential drugs for glioblastoma therapy. Effectiveness of drugs has to be tested on the experimental models [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of glioma-related genes obtained from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database were predicted to be regulated by 15 miRNAs via the miRwalk 2.0 database [ 22 ]. Zhu and colleagues [ 23 ] provided a framework of workflow for potential therapeutic drug discovery and predicted 10 potential drugs for glioblastoma therapy. Effectiveness of drugs has to be tested on the experimental models [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi, as publisher, following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication and peer-review process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%