2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTION: Improved Bone Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Over 2 Years in Patients with Chronic HBV Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
38
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
38
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5.1% of patients experienced renal impairment over the 10‐year period, which is within the range previously reported for NA therapies (2%‐7%) . The renal effects observed during TDF treatment have been attributed to the accumulation of tenofovir (TFV) within proximal tubular cells following oral administration . It is therefore recommended that patients treated with TDF undergo periodical renal monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…5.1% of patients experienced renal impairment over the 10‐year period, which is within the range previously reported for NA therapies (2%‐7%) . The renal effects observed during TDF treatment have been attributed to the accumulation of tenofovir (TFV) within proximal tubular cells following oral administration . It is therefore recommended that patients treated with TDF undergo periodical renal monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The newer preparation of tenofovir, the tenofovir alafenamide, has been felt to have a lower detrimental effect on bone health. In a double‐blind randomized study by Seto et al, in which patients were assigned to either TDF or TAF treatment, patients receiving TDF were found to have greater decreases in hip and spine bone mineral density compared with patients receiving TAF following 2 years of treatment. While more studies are forthcoming to compare TDF to TAF, it is essential to investigate the impact of TDF on the development of osteopenia/osteoporosis given its long‐term use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies examine this, likely because of the logistical difficulty of studying osteopenia/osteoporosis, which requires regular bone densitometry scans. In Seto et al's 96‐week follow‐up study, in multivariate logistic regression, having baseline hip (OR 0.576 [95% CI: 0.406‐0.818] or spine (OR 0.663 [95% CI: 0.440‐0.999]) osteopenia/osteoporosis was found to be a significant factor for losing more than 3% hip and spine bone mineral density at week 96. When dividing up patients by hip fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score quartiles, at week 96, the proportion of patients who had bone mineral density greater than 3% increased with each FRAX score quartile for TDF, but for TAF this remained relatively similar.…”
Section: Adverse Effects Of Antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When dividing up patients by hip fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score quartiles, at week 96, the proportion of patients who had bone mineral density greater than 3% increased with each FRAX score quartile for TDF, but for TAF this remained relatively similar. Unfortunately, there is no direct comparison for patients with CHB who are not taking any antiviral therapy, making it difficult to determine whether the loss of bone mineral density is more rapid than natural progression …”
Section: Adverse Effects Of Antiviral Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation