Retraction: “Is the impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical prostatectomy related to the disease risk? A single center prospective study”

Ji, Jindong; Yuan, Huipin; Wang, Liangliang; Hou, Jianquan

doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.026

Cited by 16 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1,2 Moreover, PLND may also have a beneficial effect on cancer control outcomes. [3][4][5][6][7] PLND is, however, a surgical procedure that is not potentially devoid of complications, such as lymphoceles, lymphedema, and deep venous thrombosis. 1,8 Therefore, in the absence of data supporting its role in cancer control in men with lower risk disease, it should be avoided when the probability of lymph node invasion (LNI) is low.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

External Validation of the European Association of Urology Recommendations for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Dell’Oglio

Abdollah

Suardi

et al. 2014

Journal of Endourology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

External Validation of the European Association of Urology Recommendations for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Dell’Oglio

Abdollah

Suardi

et al. 2014

Journal of Endourology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is worth noting that there was one paper [23] that was included after the literature search but it had actually been retracted due to misconduct by one of the authors and was no longer available. A significant degree of clinical and methodological heterogeneity was seen across all studies which prevented pooled analysis of the results.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature

Rees

Raison

Sheikh

et al. 2016

Turkish Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is performed alongside radical prostatectomy as the most accurate method of staging prostate cancer. Yet the potential therapeutic benefits of lymphadenectomy are yet to be confirmed. Material and methods:A PubMed database search was performed to identify all papers comparing techniques for PLND or none. The primary outcome measure was long term oncological outcomes. Studies looking at men with clinically localized prostate cancer at the time of radical prostatectomy who received no adjuvant treatment were included. Previous reviews and single case reports were excluded. The subsequent available papers were then systematically reviewed.

show abstract

“…With MI-PLND, 95 patients (95%) underwent extended and five patients (5%) underwent limited PLND: two obturator + hypogastric and three obturator-only. Operation time (skin-to-skin) was longer with MI-PLND (130 [70-240] vs 98 [59-200] min; P < 0.001), but there was less blood loss with MI-PLND (drop in hemoglobin on postoperative day 1: 1.1 ± 0.91 vs 1.7 ± 0.76 g/dL; P = 0.001) and hospital stay was shorter (3 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] vs 6 [3-10] days; P < 0.001).…”

Section: Surgical Detailsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 Apart from staging, PLND might also be therapeutic, as it improves biochemical recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival in intermediate-and high-risk PCa patients with or without LNI. 6,7 PLND can be carried out open or MI with laparoscopy or robot-assisted surgery. Contemporary PLND complication rates vary between 2-38%, with development of a symptomatic lymphocele being the main complication (0-11%).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contemporary minimally‐invasive extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer before curative radiotherapy: Prospective standardized analysis of complications

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abbreviations & AcronymsObjectives: To prospectively assess contemporary complication rates of minimallyinvasive staging pelvic lymph node dissection before curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer using a standardized classification. Methods: A total of 100 prostate cancer patients underwent laparoscopic or robotassisted pelvic lymph node dissection (95% extended). Surgical outcomes were compared with those of 43 patients undergoing open pelvic lymph node dissection (33% extended).Complications were recorded prospectively during hospitalization and follow-up visits, and graded using Clavien-Dindo classification. Lymphocele size was measured on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Results: Of the complications recorded, 10% were grade 1, 3% were grade 2 and 6% were grade 3. No grade 4-5 complications occurred. Compared with open pelvic lymph node dissection, minimally-invasive pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with less blood loss (P = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 3 vs 6 days; P < 0.001), but longer operation time (130 vs 98 min; P < 0.001). The complication rate was similar in both groups. For the entire cohort, overall and symptomatic lymphoceles were seen in 91 (64%) and 18 patients (13%), respectively. On multivariate logistic regression, minimally-invasive surgery was the only independent predictor for lymphocele development (odds ratio 3.99; P = 0.015). Conclusions: Minimally-invasive extended pelvic lymph node dissection before curative radiotherapy is associated with low morbidity. Asymptomatic lymphocele development rate is higher compared with open pelvic lymph node dissection.

show abstract

Retraction: “Is the impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical prostatectomy related to the disease risk? A single center prospective study”

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

External Validation of the European Association of Urology Recommendations for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

External Validation of the European Association of Urology Recommendations for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature

Contemporary minimally‐invasive extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer before curative radiotherapy: Prospective standardized analysis of complications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About