2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04869-w
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retraction Note: A constraint on historic growth in global photosynthesis due to increasing CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All model configurations compared reasonably well to the FluxCom and MOD17 GPP products and FluxCom and GLEAM ET products, given that there are also uncertainties inherent in estimates from these products. For example, the satellite-based products of GPP have recently been shown to incorrectly capture the response of photosynthesis to CO 2 , which means they potentially underestimate the response of GPP to rising atmospheric CO 2 (Keenan et al, 2021). Nevertheless, some notable biases in the model were identified that were common to all JULES model configurations, for example, the over-prediction of GPP and ET in the temperate and boreal region in SON and the overprediction of both fluxes in MAM in the southern tropics (0 to −20 • S).…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All model configurations compared reasonably well to the FluxCom and MOD17 GPP products and FluxCom and GLEAM ET products, given that there are also uncertainties inherent in estimates from these products. For example, the satellite-based products of GPP have recently been shown to incorrectly capture the response of photosynthesis to CO 2 , which means they potentially underestimate the response of GPP to rising atmospheric CO 2 (Keenan et al, 2021). Nevertheless, some notable biases in the model were identified that were common to all JULES model configurations, for example, the over-prediction of GPP and ET in the temperate and boreal region in SON and the overprediction of both fluxes in MAM in the southern tropics (0 to −20 • S).…”
Section: Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, accounting for the LRU response to CO 2 in historical scenarios, such as the preindustrial era (Aydin et al ., 2020) or glacial periods (Aydin et al ., 2016), is essential for using long‐term records of atmospheric COS concentrations to infer terrestrial photosynthesis of the past (Campbell et al ., 2017). Third, given that COS is an atmospheric tracer circulating the globe, the LRU response to CO 2 presents an opportunity of using COS measurements as a top‐down constraint on present‐day CO 2 fertilization effects over large spatial scales (Walker et al ., 2021), complementing current understandings derived from site‐level measurements (Norby & Zak, 2011; Keenan et al ., 2013), satellite‐observed vegetation indices (Smith et al ., 2016; De Kauwe et al ., 2016) and terrestrial biosphere models (Haverd et al ., 2020; Keenan et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental uncertainty in predicting future climate concerns how terrestrial photosynthesis responds and feeds back to the climate (Heimann & Reichstein, 2008; Bonan & Doney, 2018; Arora et al ., 2020). Already, with climate change, terrestrial photosynthesis has experienced a boost in response to rising CO 2 (Schimel et al ., 2015; Campbell et al ., 2017; Keenan et al ., 2021), advancement of phenology due to warming (Keenan et al ., 2014) and altered regional variability caused by shifts in rainfall patterns (Zhang et al ., 2016; Haverd et al ., 2017). Although major physiological processes underlying observed changes in photosynthesis are relatively well‐known (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced concentration of CO 2 in the atmosphere stimulates faster photosynthesis. A recent analysis suggests that from 1981 to 2020, this form of “CO 2 fertilization” increased global photosynthesis by 12% (Keenan et al., 2021). But the rise in CO 2 has led to increased nutrient limitation.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%