Retraction: PREDICTION MODELS OF SARCOPENIA IN JAPANESE ADULT MEN AND WOMEN

Miyachi, Motohiko; Miyachi, Motohiko; Yamamoto, Keizô; Murakami, Haruka; Tanimoto, Mitsutoshi; Omori, Yumi; Kawano, Hiroshi; Gando, Yuko; Hanawa, Satoshi; Iemitsu, Motoyuki; Tabata, Izumi; Higuchi, Mitsuru; Okumura, Shigeki

doi:10.7600/jspfsm.59.291

Cited by 10 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The range of cut-off values shown in Table 1 for skeletal muscle index (SMI) or appendicular skeletal muscle mass adjusted by height, was 5.72-8.81 kg/m 2 in men and 4.23-7.36 kg/m 2 in women measured by DXA. [2][3][4][5][6]10,11,14,15,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] In addition, although the golden standard method of measurement is dual DXA, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has also been used, as the method is convenient and cost-effective, making it a more desirable and perhaps appropriate method for large-scale population studies. The range of cut-off values for BIA measurements of muscle mass were 7.00-8.87 kg/m 2 in men and 5.75-6.42 kg/m 2 in women, which are smaller ranges as the number of studies are fewer relative to those using DXA.…”

Section: Muscle Massmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Sanada et al reported cut-off values for an Asian sample using Baumgartner's suggested method, two standard deviations below the sex-specific mean of a young population, 6.87 kg/m 2 in Japanese men and 5.46 kg/m 2 in women measured by DXA. 5 In 2000, Janssen developed and published predictive equations for estimating skeletal muscle mass using BIA, 56 which has since been referred to by many researchers using BIA to define sarcopenia. 8,19,37,57 Janssen et al used the common definition for sarcopenia (i.e.…”

Section: Working Definition Of Sarcopeniamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 Many investigators have attempted to clarify and establish a definition for the estimation of sarcopenia in older adults, as there is still a lack of consensus on components for the diagnosis of sarcopenia and the corresponding cut-off values. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] While some investigators maintain that sarcopenia should be characterized solely on muscle mass, since the publication of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) definition, more studies have used the combined definition of muscle mass, strength and performance to define sarcopenia. 9 The issue then, is that the reported prevalence of sarcopenia, or any outcome, varies depending on the definition used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sarcopenia: Prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community‐dwelling older adults

Kim

Hirano

Edahiro

et al. 2016

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The age-related loss of muscle mass and/or strength and performance, sarcopenia, has been associated with geriatric syndromes, morbidity and mortality. Although sarcopenia has been researched for many years, currently there is a lack of consensus on its definition. Some studies define sarcopenia as low muscle mass alone, whereas other studies have recently combined low muscle mass, strength and physical performance suggested by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, as well as the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. The arbitrary use of various available sarcopenia definitions within the literature can cause discrepancies in the prevalence and associated risk factors. The application of population-specific cut-off values in any sample population can be problematic, particularly among different ethnicities. Using commonly used cut-off points to define sarcopenia, including solely muscle mass and combined definitions, on a community-dwelling elderly Japanese population, the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 2.5 to 28.0% in men and 2.3 to 11.7% in women, with muscle mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and 7.1-98.0% in men and 19.8-88.0% in women measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Body mass index was the most prominent related factor for sarcopenia across the definitions in this Japanese sample. However, other associated hematological and chronic condition factors varied depending on the definition.

show abstract

Section: Muscle Massmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Working Definition Of Sarcopeniamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sarcopenia: Prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community‐dwelling older adults

Kim

Hirano

Edahiro

et al. 2016

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, Sanada et al reported prediction models for skeletal muscle index using body mass index (BMI) in Japanese adults. 29 The results showed that the R 2 values for the skeletal muscle index were 0.56 in men and 0.45 in women. Similarly, Gallagher et al reported that height and weight accounted for 64% and 67% of the total variance of the appendicular skeletal muscle mass in African-American and Caucasian women, respec-tively, and 63% and 39% of the total variance in African-American and Caucasian men, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Estimation of appendicular muscle mass and fat mass by near infrared spectroscopy in older persons

Yoshida¹,

Shimada²,

Harada

et al. 2012

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Skeletal muscle mass loss may also have the potential to impact quality of life and ultimately the need for long-term care in elderly people [23]. Several studies developed equations for estimating skeletal muscle mass [24][25][26]. …”

Section: Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comprehensive Physical Function Assessment in Elderly People

Ito¹

2017

Clinical Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In elderly people with mobility limitations, abnormalities in posture and gait contribute to the greater decline of physical motor function. The aim of the review article was to determine the comprehensive physical motor function assessment. Muscle function was assessed with the grip strength. Gait function was assessed with walking time tests conducted at a normal pace. Balance function was assessed with one-legged standing time. The 6-min walking distance test (6MD) was performed in a 10-m, straight corridor. Walking efficiency during the 6MD trials was measured using the Cosmed K4b2 (Rome, Italy), an indirect calorimetry system specifically designed to measure energy expenditure in nonlaboratory settings. The center of pressure was recorded using a balance board (Wii; Nintendo Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). A vibratory stimulus was applied alternately to two muscles by fixing two vibrators from the vibration device onto the participant's gastrocnemius and lumbar multifidus muscle. These findings show that an assessment affecting postural control under proprioceptive stimulation might be a good indicator of elderly people. Also, the objective assessment of walking efficiency might be important for identifying the risk of external activity limitation or functional limitations among the late elderly.

show abstract

Retraction: PREDICTION MODELS OF SARCOPENIA IN JAPANESE ADULT MEN AND WOMEN

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

Sarcopenia: Prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community‐dwelling older adults

Sarcopenia: Prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community‐dwelling older adults

Estimation of appendicular muscle mass and fat mass by near infrared spectroscopy in older persons

Comprehensive Physical Function Assessment in Elderly People

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About