2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrievability of Calcium Silicate–based Root Canal Sealers During Retreatment: An Ex Vivo Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas, the percentage of regaining patency was 90%, 80%, 90%,100% for group A, B, C and D respectively. The result about regaining WL and patency in this study coincided with some previous studies that reported the WL was regained in 100% of all groups while patency not attainment in all groups.in the study of Oltra et al,2016 patency regained only in 14% of the boiceramic sealers samples and also Carrillo et al,2022 reported that the percentage of regaining patency was 63% in endosequence BC group. This could be imputed to the known fact that the calcium silicate-based sealers become very hard after complete setting, as the Hess et al,2011 reported that the SEM analysis observed the remained bioceramic sealers in the apical foramen and prevented the regaining of patency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Whereas, the percentage of regaining patency was 90%, 80%, 90%,100% for group A, B, C and D respectively. The result about regaining WL and patency in this study coincided with some previous studies that reported the WL was regained in 100% of all groups while patency not attainment in all groups.in the study of Oltra et al,2016 patency regained only in 14% of the boiceramic sealers samples and also Carrillo et al,2022 reported that the percentage of regaining patency was 63% in endosequence BC group. This could be imputed to the known fact that the calcium silicate-based sealers become very hard after complete setting, as the Hess et al,2011 reported that the SEM analysis observed the remained bioceramic sealers in the apical foramen and prevented the regaining of patency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[ 11 ] In this study, NeoSEALER Flo was utilized as it is heat-resistant and deemed safe for the WVC obturation technique, as claimed by the manufacturer. [ 9 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these limitations did not influence the results of this study. [ 9 35 ] Another potential limitation of the study is that the initial preparation size was relatively small, measuring only 25.04. Despite this, the investigation focused on the effectiveness of the retreatment files in removing sealers from within the canals according to the obturation techniques used without any additional preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As similar to the study of Carrillo et al root canals were cleaned and prepared with EdgeFile X7 (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, NM) files #20/04, #25/04, #30/04 and #35/04 respectively. 7 Each canal file was replaced with a new one after being used on 5 teeth. During each file change, irrigation was done with 2.5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (Wizard, Rehber Kimya; İstanbul, Türkiye).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%