1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00216853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieval of a wind profile from the Galileo Probe telemetry signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also shown are the retrieved winds when the probe descent longitude is in error by the 99% amount of 0.19 ø (dot-dashed curve). It is seen that, under the worst case assumptions of no thermal corrections for the USO stability, descent velocity errors of 5%, and the 99% Notes: 1, Constant effect (which is completely removable from the Doppler profile) and uncertainty; uncertainty is due to uncertainties in probe and orbiter radial locations, and in GMj; 2, based on Orton III atmosphere, refractive properties of H2, He, NH3, and CH4, probe aspect angle of 10 ø at 20 bars depth; uncertainty in NH 3 mixing ratio of 10%, and 0.1% uncertainty in helium and hydrogen mixing ratios assumed [Atkinson and Spilker, 1991;Pollack et al, 1992]; 3, assuming model ionosphere of constant electron density equal to 5 x 10 4 cm -3 over a 4000 km layer; a better model would be that of Hinson et al [1997], however, the basic conclusion that the ionospheric effect is negligible remains unchanged; 4, assuming probe spin rate of 30 rpm and probe aspect angle of 5 ø [Atkinson, 1989]; 5, assuming probe spin rate of 30 rpm [Atkinson, 1989]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also shown are the retrieved winds when the probe descent longitude is in error by the 99% amount of 0.19 ø (dot-dashed curve). It is seen that, under the worst case assumptions of no thermal corrections for the USO stability, descent velocity errors of 5%, and the 99% Notes: 1, Constant effect (which is completely removable from the Doppler profile) and uncertainty; uncertainty is due to uncertainties in probe and orbiter radial locations, and in GMj; 2, based on Orton III atmosphere, refractive properties of H2, He, NH3, and CH4, probe aspect angle of 10 ø at 20 bars depth; uncertainty in NH 3 mixing ratio of 10%, and 0.1% uncertainty in helium and hydrogen mixing ratios assumed [Atkinson and Spilker, 1991;Pollack et al, 1992]; 3, assuming model ionosphere of constant electron density equal to 5 x 10 4 cm -3 over a 4000 km layer; a better model would be that of Hinson et al [1997], however, the basic conclusion that the ionospheric effect is negligible remains unchanged; 4, assuming probe spin rate of 30 rpm and probe aspect angle of 5 ø [Atkinson, 1989]; 5, assuming probe spin rate of 30 rpm [Atkinson, 1989]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since nearly all the solar energy is absorbed by methane in the lower stratosphere (1-100 mbar), in the ammonia clouds (bottom level at ---700 mbar), and absorbed and scattered by aerosols and other gasses at slightly deeper levels [Hunten et al, 1980], no significant global-scale circulation is expected to result from solar insolation. A wind profile driven principally by differential solar heating would therefore be expected to diminish rapidly in the upper 2 bars of the atmosphere [Pollack et al, 1992].…”
Section: Expected Wind Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Paper number 90RS02529. 0048-6604/91/90RS-02529508.00 31 A vertical profile of zonal winds at the probe location can be retrieved from the time history of the RRL carrier frequency (see Atkinson [1989] or Pollack et al [1990]). From accurate reconstructions of spacecraft trajectories a frequency profile is computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%