2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieving surface soil moisture over a wheat field: Comparison of different methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite our simulation parameters are very stringent, our analysis [ Fig. 6(a)-(f)] confirm previously reported results [20], and retrievals with experimental L-band radiometric data [21], that have formulated the retrieval process in terms of and over the earth's surface. From this analysis, the following conclusions can be summarized.…”
Section: B Soil Moisture Retrievalssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite our simulation parameters are very stringent, our analysis [ Fig. 6(a)-(f)] confirm previously reported results [20], and retrievals with experimental L-band radiometric data [21], that have formulated the retrieval process in terms of and over the earth's surface. From this analysis, the following conclusions can be summarized.…”
Section: B Soil Moisture Retrievalssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…4, for different soil moisture conditions), and additionally, the SM required accuracy is not as critical as in the SSS retrieval problem. The brightness temperature model used in the simulations is the model, as used in the multiangular and dual-polarization soil moisture retrievals presented in [20] and [21] …”
Section: B Soil Moisture Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of the albedo is considered directly in the brightness temperature model (4) where is the reflection coefficient defined in (1), is the vegetation temperature, is the soil temperature (an effective temperature has been computed from the soil temperature registered at different depths, see Section II-B), stands for the polarization (horizontal or vertical), and is the reflection coefficient due to the canopy layer, which is usually very small and can be neglected, so (4) can be written as (5) Some studies demonstrate that crops with vertical architecture (such as wheat) have an optical depth dependent on the polarization [12], but no study was found about vineyards. In this study, various dependences for albedo and opacity have been analyzed, obtaining the best results when the albedo and the opacity are assumed to be independent on the polarization.…”
Section: A Direct Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the brightness temperature differences () to soil moisture (93 K), relative sensitivities were obtained. The range of maximum and minimum values and the base values of parameters (Table 3) were adopted from different publications [11,14,[20][21][22][23]. According to the investigation of other researchers the base values for vegetation water content (0.7), b-factor (0.1), and soil roughness (0.1) are not close to the arithmetic mean of the range because they are not normally distributed [2,11].…”
Section: Relative Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%