Retro-translocation of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins

Abstract

The content of mitochondrial proteome is maintained through two highly dynamic processes, the influx of newly synthesized proteins from the cytosol and the protein degradation. Mitochondrial proteins are targeted to the intermembrane space by the mitochondrial intermembrane space assembly pathway that couples their import and oxidative folding. The folding trap was proposed to be a driving mechanism for the mitochondrial accumulation of these proteins. Whether the reverse movement of unfolded proteins to the cytosol occurs across the intact outer membrane is unknown. We found that reduced, conformationally destabilized proteins are released from mitochondria in a size-limited manner. We identified the general import pore protein Tom40 as an escape gate. We propose that the mitochondrial proteome is not only regulated by the import and degradation of proteins but also by their retro-translocation to the external cytosolic location. Thus, protein release is a mechanism that contributes to the mitochondrial proteome surveillance. Because most mitochondrial proteins originate in the cytosol, mitochondria had to develop a protein import system. Given the complex architecture of these organelles, with two membranes and two aqueous compartments, protein import and sorting require the cooperation of several pathways. The main entry gate for precursor proteins is the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) complex. Upon entering mitochondria, proteins are routed to different sorting machineries (1-5).Reaching the final location is one step in the maturation of mitochondrial proteins that must be accompanied by their proper folding. The mitochondrial intermembrane space assembly (MIA) pathway for intermembrane space (IMS) proteins illustrates the importance of coupling these processes because this pathway links protein import with oxidative folding (6-10). Upon protein synthesis in the cytosol, the cysteine residues of IMS proteins remain in a reduced state, owing to the reducing properties of the cytosolic environment (11,12). After entering the TOM channel, precursor proteins are specifically recognized by Mia40 protein, and their cysteine residues are oxidized through the cooperative action of Mia40 and Erv1 proteins (7,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Mia40 is a receptor, folding catalyst, and disulfide carrier, and the Erv1 protein serves as a sulfhydryl oxidase. The oxidative folding is believed to provide a trapping mechanism that prevents the escape of proteins from the IMS back to the cytosol (10, 13, 18). Our initial result raised a possibility that the reverse process can also occur, as we observed the relocation of in vitro imported Tim8 from mitochondria to the incubation buffer (13). Thus, we sought to establish whether and how this process can proceed in the presence of the intact outer membrane (OM). Our study provides, to our knowledge, the first characterization of the mitochondrial protein retro-translocation. The protein retro-translocation serves as a regulatory and quality control mechanism for th...

Methionine Adenosyltransferase α1 Is Targeted to the Mitochondrial Matrix and Interacts with Cytochrome P450 2E1 to Lower Its Expression

“…Although the mitochondrial matrix is not accessible to the cytosolic proteasome, the outer mitochondrial membrane is. Ubiquitination of key mitochondrial outer membrane proteins can alter mitochondrial dynamics through fusion (mitofusins) and fission of mitochondria . The ubiquitination proteasome‐mediated degradation of the mitofusin proteins Mitofusin 1 and Mitofusin 2 in damaged mitochondria is necessary in order to prevent fusion with healthy mitochondria and favor fragmentation instead .…”

Inhibition of proteasome rescues a pathogenic variant of respiratory chain assembly factor COA7

“…Many mitochondrial precursor proteins, before they productively reach the mitochondrial compartment, are under control of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), a major protein‐degrading pathway that is involved in maintaining cellular protein homeostasis (Radke et al , ; Bragoszewski et al , ). Furthermore, IMS proteins can undergo reductive unfolding and slide back to the cytosol where they are also degraded by the UPS (Bragoszewski et al , ). However, the contribution of cytosolic protein control mechanisms to mitochondriopathies has not been investigated.…”

Mistargeted mitochondrial proteins activate a proteostatic response in the cytosol

“…The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) [9][10][11][12] is involved in the degradation of MIA substrate proteins 8,13 . Abundance of many proteins involved in the UPS did not change in mia40-4int S , including the core proteasomal subunits (Supplementary Table 3 and Extended Data Fig.…”