2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroarc deformation and exhumation near the end of the Andes, southern Patagonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
102
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
11
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such nonuniform spatial patterns of uplift have also been suggested for the Northern Andes (Hoorn et al, 1995). For the Southern Andes, Blisniuk et al (2005) indicates that most of the uplift would have occurred by 16.5 Ma, earlier than most of the Central Andes, and several studies are in line with the idea of an Early Miocene uplift of the Southern Andes (e.g., Jordan et al, 2001;Encinas et al, 2013;Fosdick et al, 2013), but Late Miocene phases of uplift have also been reported for the northern Patagonian Andes (Ramos et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Such nonuniform spatial patterns of uplift have also been suggested for the Northern Andes (Hoorn et al, 1995). For the Southern Andes, Blisniuk et al (2005) indicates that most of the uplift would have occurred by 16.5 Ma, earlier than most of the Central Andes, and several studies are in line with the idea of an Early Miocene uplift of the Southern Andes (e.g., Jordan et al, 2001;Encinas et al, 2013;Fosdick et al, 2013), but Late Miocene phases of uplift have also been reported for the northern Patagonian Andes (Ramos et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This estimation agrees with the proposed timing for the beginning of the 'Quechua Phase' of Andean tectonics around 19-18 Ma (Malumián and Ramos, 1984;Ramos, 1989;Marshall and Salinas, 1990a;Ramos and Kay, 1992;. Additionally, this interpretation is supported by the synchronous acceleration of exhumation rates across the Patagonian Andes (Thomson et al, 2001), estimated to have occurred between 17-14.24 Ma by Blisniuk et al (2006), and between 22-18 Ma by Fosdick et al (2013) in the retro-foreland region. The dynamic Oligocene-Miocene tectonic configuration of the Patagonian Andes generated by: 1. changes in the subduction velocity, convergence rate, and obliquity of the Nazca and South American plates (Pardo-Casas and Molnar, 1987); and 2. an increase in compression and shortening related to the collision of an unstable oceanic spreading center (quadruple junction) at 18-17 Ma (Breitsprecher and Thorkelson, 2009;Eagles et al, 2009), followed by the subduction and northward migration of the Chile Ridge (Cande and Leslie, 1986;Lagabrielle et al, 2004), seem to be the primary factors triggering the uplift, concomitant widening and foreland propagation of the fold-and-thrust belt during Early Miocene times (Ramos and Ghiglione, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although the geological record from this region is not complete enough to assess whether the main tectonic events have been synchronous across the Patagonian and Fuegian Andes, a partial time overlap of some deformational episodes within the two domains during the Cenozoic (Cande and Leslie, 1986;Thomson et al, 2011;Somoza and Ghidella, 2012;Fosdick et al, 2013) appears to be compatible with our AMS results.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…A major thrusting event and uplift in the Paleogene has been also constrained using zircon (U-Th)/He dating from the eastern domains of the southern Patagonian Andes (Fosdick et al, 2013). The Eocene tectonics became much stronger towards the south affecting in particular Tierra del Fuego due to fast ~NE-directed subduction of the Phoenix plate between 47-28 Ma (Ramos and Aleman, 2000;Olivero and Martinioni, 2001;Kraemer, 2003;Ghiglione and Ramos, 2005;Ghidella, 2005, 2012;Ghiglione and Cristallini, 2007).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation