2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5273(01)00402-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroesophageal aortic arch: diagnostic and therapeutic implications of a rare vascular ring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is 50% to 60% prevalence for additional cardiac anomalies. 20,21 Chest radiography and echocardiography have shown poor sensitivity for this diagnosis, whereas MR imaging can accurately define the aortic arch anatomy for surgical planning. 20 …”
Section: Circumflex Aortic Archmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is 50% to 60% prevalence for additional cardiac anomalies. 20,21 Chest radiography and echocardiography have shown poor sensitivity for this diagnosis, whereas MR imaging can accurately define the aortic arch anatomy for surgical planning. 20 …”
Section: Circumflex Aortic Archmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive review of the literature yields a total of 58 asymptomatic or unrepaired vascular rings documented over the course of 18 studies, including the current study [4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the individual cases while Table 2 summarizes the overall characteristics of the cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital heart diseases have several morphological abnormalities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]and it is very important to recognize the spatial relationship of abnormal structures accurately before deciding on a surgical strategy [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Conventional angiogram has been considered a gold standard to evaluate the abnormal structures but the images are two-dimensional and sometimes it is difficult to recognize the complex spatial relationship of abnormalities three-dimensionally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%