There is nothing more frustrating than failing recanalization of a chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). At the SYNTAX trial, approximately one-fourth of the studied population had CTOs and although the recanalization attempt rate was high (93%), success rate was only 53% [1]. For decades, the only route for CTO recanalization has been anterograde. Numerous advances in guidewire design and manipulation have improved recanalization rates through this route; however, success rates plateau around 70% [2]. Several predictors of antegrade failure have been identified such as operator experience and specific lesion characteristics (time duration, nontapered stump, occlusion length >20 mm, presence of severe calcification, bridging collateral, vessel tortuosity, and ostial location) [3]. Recently, the retrograde approach either as a default strategy after antegrade failure or as a primary strategy in selected cases has increased dramatically the overall success rates [4,5]. Undoubtedly, the retrograde route is a very complex one. It requires considerable operator expertise in addition to the presence of suitable septal or epicardial collaterals and the use of dedicated CTO tools [4]. Furthermore, the retrograde approach is associated with higher risk of complications and radiation exposure than the conventional antegrade route. Of note, the presence of antegrade predictors of failure does not impact retrograde success [4]. In this issue of our journal, Rinfret et al. report a series of patients with CTOs who underwent retrograde recanalization through bilateral transradial puncture [6]. In this study, success rate was 88% (37/42). Wiring collateral was feasible in 36 patients (85%), and most of them were successfully recanalized using state of the arts CTO techniques (pure retrograde crossing 29%, CART 3%, reverse CART 60% and kissing/knuckle wire 5%) through 6F guiding catheters. Importantly, the lack of back-up support expected with the use of small guiding catheters was overcome with modern CTO tools (Tornus and Corsair, both from Asahi Intec, Nagoya, Japan) and tricks (externalization of 300-mm long guidewires and anchoring techniques). As in previous series, the procedure did not lead to severe cardiovascular complications but then there is no data regarding radiation exposure, which can be expected to be high in this type of procedures.Naturally, to navigate wires through tiny and tortuous collaterals and get to open extremely complex CTOs appears glamorous and challenging to the operators. Nonetheless, the precise role of this technique is still evolving. For most cases, it appears safe to start with the conservative route. In the event of failure, retrograde recanalization can be attempted by a skill CTO operator, if clinically indicated.