2016
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroperitoneal colonic perforation from a foreign body – ‘cannibalization’ effect of a toothpick – a video vignette

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case reports describe managing patients non-operatively with antibiotics or with surgery, as in this case 2. There are cases reporting the use of laparoscopy to manage foreign body perforations 11. We were unable to do so in our case as we felt it was unsafe to proceed with the initial laparoscopic findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Case reports describe managing patients non-operatively with antibiotics or with surgery, as in this case 2. There are cases reporting the use of laparoscopy to manage foreign body perforations 11. We were unable to do so in our case as we felt it was unsafe to proceed with the initial laparoscopic findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Most of the patients were unaware of the event of swallowing a toothpick, making diagnosis difficult 3. It was described in some case reports that toothpick can silently migrate outside gastrointestinal tract resulting in rare complications like spondylodiscitis in our case 4. We describe a case of delayed diagnosis of toothpick ingestion causing small bowel perforation, abdominal wall abscess and spondylodiscitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%