2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal tumors: intermediate results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled proportion of clinical efficacy was 89% [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.94) in cryoablation therapy from 20 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] studies with a total of 457 cases. There was statistical significance regarding heterogeneity (I² value)=70.6%) (p<0.0001)…”
Section: Pooled Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pooled proportion of clinical efficacy was 89% [95% confidential interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.94) in cryoablation therapy from 20 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] studies with a total of 457 cases. There was statistical significance regarding heterogeneity (I² value)=70.6%) (p<0.0001)…”
Section: Pooled Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a mean radiographic follow-up of 5 months, no tumor recurrence was found. Most recently, Lee et al [12] published their intermediate results with retroperitoneal laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal tumors located peripherally. A total of 20 patients (11 with documented renal cell carcinoma on intraoperative biopsy) with renal masses ranging from 1.4 to 4.5 cm in diameter underwent the procedure.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryoablation of renal masses was Wrst described by Uchida et al [2]. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal cryoablation was Wrst performed by Gill et al [3] and has subsequently been reported by several other groups [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Given the proximity of the tumor to the ureter and renal hilum, we choose to use robotic assistance to facilitate dissection of these critical structures away from the tumor to minimize collateral damage from the iceball.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%