2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01164-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective analysis and reclassification of DYSF variants in a large French series of dysferlinopathy patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most intractable impediments in investigating rare diseases is the paucity in patient source. In the last decade, nationwide multicenter genetic studies regarding the DYSF gene (Table 1) have been conducted in Italy (Magri et al, 2017), Netherlands (Ten Dam et al, 2019), UK (Klinge et al, 2010), Japan (Izumi et al, 2020), Korea (Shin et al, 2015), and France (Charnay et al, 2021), with 30-250 patients in each but the results lack integration. A previous database-derived study named UMD-DYSF has been conducted in France by analyzing 266 reported DYSF variants in 2012 (Blandin et al, 2012), however, there is no updated comprehensive genetic analysis since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most intractable impediments in investigating rare diseases is the paucity in patient source. In the last decade, nationwide multicenter genetic studies regarding the DYSF gene (Table 1) have been conducted in Italy (Magri et al, 2017), Netherlands (Ten Dam et al, 2019), UK (Klinge et al, 2010), Japan (Izumi et al, 2020), Korea (Shin et al, 2015), and France (Charnay et al, 2021), with 30-250 patients in each but the results lack integration. A previous database-derived study named UMD-DYSF has been conducted in France by analyzing 266 reported DYSF variants in 2012 (Blandin et al, 2012), however, there is no updated comprehensive genetic analysis since then.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant ACMG/AMP classifications for the Chinese dysferlinopathy cohortIn the Chinese dysferlinopathy cohort, several standards of the ACMG/ AMP guideline were modified according to the actual situations of the cohort and previous similar studies(Charnay et al, 2021;Dionnet et al, 2020): (1) PVS1 score was assigned in accordance with ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) recommendations for interpreting the loss of function variants (Abou Tayoun et al, 2018); (2) Since functional studies of the RNA or protein activity were not performed, PS3 score was not applicable; (3) PP3 score was assigned if CADD PHRED score above 25; (4) PM3 score was assigned referring to the SVI Recommendation for in trans Criterion PM3 (Version 1.0); (5) PP1 score was assigned according to the recommendations on recessive disorders by the Hearing Loss ClinGen Working group (Oza et al, 2018); (6) Though protein expression assay was performed in only few patients (Table…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 38 In addition, a recently published reclassification of DYSF variants in a large French series of patients with dysferlinopathy revealed changed pathogenicity for 17/176 (9.7%) variants. 39 One of the main reasons for the reclassification is the availability of variant frequencies in large population databases (like gnomAD). Further expansion of such databases could help further reclassify some of the variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All variants were classified according to the ACMG recommendations [ 21 ] adapted to LGMD genes [ 22 ]. Variants in TTN were classified according to the TTN -specific recommendations [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%