2017
DOI: 10.1177/1078155217722405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective analysis of goal drug level attainment of posaconazole for invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia pre- and post-switch to tablet formulation

Abstract: Patients receiving posaconazole tablets attained significantly higher serum drug levels than those receiving suspension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with several studies in patients with hematological/oncological underlying diseases reaching these targeted exposure ranges (Cornely et al, 2016;Cumpston et al, 2015;Jeong et al, 2016;Pham et al, 2016). Nevertheless, the rate of patients who achieved the targeted posaconazole serum levels at steady state is comparable to a study by Miceli et al (2015), but lower compared to other published data (Durani et al, 2015;Liebenstein et al, 2018). Another study by Chin et al reported a rate of only 44% of patients who reached stable posaconazole serum levels 1,000 mg/L in antifungal therapy, whereby outcome was unfortunately not reported (Chin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results are in line with several studies in patients with hematological/oncological underlying diseases reaching these targeted exposure ranges (Cornely et al, 2016;Cumpston et al, 2015;Jeong et al, 2016;Pham et al, 2016). Nevertheless, the rate of patients who achieved the targeted posaconazole serum levels at steady state is comparable to a study by Miceli et al (2015), but lower compared to other published data (Durani et al, 2015;Liebenstein et al, 2018). Another study by Chin et al reported a rate of only 44% of patients who reached stable posaconazole serum levels 1,000 mg/L in antifungal therapy, whereby outcome was unfortunately not reported (Chin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Oral absorption of POS oral suspension is affected by food and gastric pH. In contrast, POS tablets contain the active drug mixed with a pH‐sensitive polymer and this polymer releases the drug in the intestines, causing threefold increased exposures compared to POS oral suspension …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, POS tablets contain the active drug mixed with a pH-sensitive polymer 10 and this polymer releases the drug in the intestines, causing threefold increased exposures compared to POS oral suspension. 11 Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been widely implemented to assess therapeutic efficacy of POS oral suspension but its usefulness is in a state of flux following the introduction of the new POS formulations specifically in the setting of prophylaxis. [12][13][14] Current guidelines recommend a Ctrough concentration of ≥0.7 mg/L for prophylaxis and >1.0 mg/L for primary and >1.25 mg/L for salvage therapy, 15 although these concentrations were determined independent of the susceptibility of the infecting pathogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of patients with posaconazole C avg or trough concentrations (C min ) of Ͻ700 ng/ml reported in observational TDM studies with posaconazole tablets varies widely. A number of early observational studies reported that between 0% and 10% of patients did not achieve C avg or C min above 700 ng/ml (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29), similar to the phase III posaconazole registration trials (14,30). Other studies have reported rates of posaconazole C min below 700 ng/ml, ranging from 10% to 20% of patients (16,19,31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%