2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2021.101138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective analysis of two diagnostic tests: Carotid Doppler ultrasound and diagnostic cerebral angiography for carotid disease in the Mexican population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 Adverse effects reported with the use of ICG-VA, whether microscopic or endoscopic, are seen in less than 0.1% of patients while up to 1.2% have been reported for conventional angiography studies because it is considered a completely invasive study. 18,19 On the other hand, one of the main limitations of the use of mICG-VA is that the residual neck cannot be visualized if these is really small, or neither smaller caliber perforating branches due to limited viewing angles of the microscope; however, if we use both devices rigid endoscope and mICG-VA as in our case, on the one hand we can visualize the patency of the flow in the perforating vessels and on the other, with the endoscope, visualize if there were perforating vessels that are not recognized by mICG-VA and also the presence or absence of residual neck. 20,21 Dual use of mICG-VA and endoscopy has been previously reported with good results and virtually no complications.…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Adverse effects reported with the use of ICG-VA, whether microscopic or endoscopic, are seen in less than 0.1% of patients while up to 1.2% have been reported for conventional angiography studies because it is considered a completely invasive study. 18,19 On the other hand, one of the main limitations of the use of mICG-VA is that the residual neck cannot be visualized if these is really small, or neither smaller caliber perforating branches due to limited viewing angles of the microscope; however, if we use both devices rigid endoscope and mICG-VA as in our case, on the one hand we can visualize the patency of the flow in the perforating vessels and on the other, with the endoscope, visualize if there were perforating vessels that are not recognized by mICG-VA and also the presence or absence of residual neck. 20,21 Dual use of mICG-VA and endoscopy has been previously reported with good results and virtually no complications.…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%